From: Claus Spitzer Date: 2004-06-13T07:06:43+09:00 Subject: Re: undefine well yes... It's just part of the procedural-->OO shift that everyone needs to go through at some point. On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 06:48:37 +0900, Robert Klemme wrote: > > > "Claus Spitzer" schrieb im Newsbeitrag > news:a7c2a81904061213093afcb11b@mail.gmail.com... > > I concur. > > It's probably easier if you think of a variable as just a pointer to > > an object, not as the objects themselves. > > Maybe it's easier because it's more accurate? ;-) > > robert > > > > > > On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 04:48:36 +0900, Robert Klemme > wrote: > > > > > > > > > "tony summerfelt" schrieb im Newsbeitrag > > > news:p3hmc0p6h00cq59vcl6jk0f61r9ir3gl4e@4ax.com... > > > > > > > > > > is there a way to undefine a variable? > > > > > > like > > > > > > x = nil > > > > > > Note: defined? does not have the same importance as in Perl. > > > > > > robert > > > > > > > > > > > >