From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>
Date: 2004-06-13T04:21:22+09:00
Subject: Re: Appropriate use of camelCase

Gregory Millam wrote:
> Received: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 03:58:37 +0900
> And lo, Ryan wrote:
> 
> 
>>Ruby's looks cryptic by comparison. (I particularly dislike ruby's lack of
>>an 'in' operator - adding that would be a MUCH better way to increase
>>readability) Ruby blocks may not be as intuitive, but they DEFINITELY
>>stack better.
> 
> 
> Ruby does have an 'in' operator.
> 
> --
> 
> lst = [1,2,3,4]
> 
> for i in foo
>   puts i
> end

He knows about for/in -- he's talking about an 'in' operator
as in RCR 241 (mine), which some love and some hate.


Hal