From: Gregory Millam <walker@...>
Date: 2004-06-13T04:10:51+09:00
Subject: Re: Appropriate use of camelCase

Received: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 03:58:37 +0900
And lo, Ryan wrote:

> Ruby's looks cryptic by comparison. (I particularly dislike ruby's lack of
> an 'in' operator - adding that would be a MUCH better way to increase
> readability) Ruby blocks may not be as intuitive, but they DEFINITELY
> stack better.

Ruby does have an 'in' operator.

--

lst = [1,2,3,4]

for i in foo
  puts i
end

#=>
1
2
3
4

--

It is identical to

foo.each do |i|
  puts i
end

- Greg