From: Rich <rich@...>
Date: 2004-06-12T07:06:27+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] EZExerb 2.0

Scratch that.

I'm testing it on WinXP and it's saying that it found ver. 3.2.0, when the
test box doesn't have a bit of ruby on it.

All - Sorry for this noise, let me figure out what's going on and send more
in a bit.

-Rich

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich" <rich@lithinos.com>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ANN] EZExerb 2.0


> I've implemented your suggestions, and they're a lot better than what I
> had - thanks!
>
> I hope the latest works now... thanks for helping me work this out.
>
> -Rich
>
> >
> > The reason is that i don't have the binary files from exerb installed.
> > This is also not necessary to use exerb, you only can trust that the
> > "lib" files are somewhere in the library path. At least this is what i
> > found in the doc files, and it works perfectly. Using
> >
> > ruby -r exerb/mkexr foo.rb
> >
> > is enough to get a recipe file.
> > So your code should be:
> >
> > require 'exerb/version'
> > @exerb_major_version=Exerb::VERSION.split(".")[0]
> >
> > And of course use a begin/rescue if exerb is not installed.
> >
> >
> > -- 
> >  Best regards,                        emailto: scholz at scriptolutions
> dot com
> >  Lothar Scholz                        http://www.ruby-ide.com
> >  CTO Scriptolutions                   Ruby, PHP, Python IDE 's
> >
> >
> >
>
>