From: Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...>
Date: 2004-06-12T05:19:03+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 05:09:09 +0900, Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> wrote:

> The order shouldn't matter, but it's better to have control over the order
> rather than have them run in an arbitrary order selected by the library.
> With control, you could randomize the list of tests and run the randomized
> battery n times.  When the tests are alphabetical, they're always run in
> alphabetical order.


How is alphabetical order any better/worse than "the order they are
added to their batteries" in this regard?  Or does your framework
allow order randomization?