From: daz Date: 2004-06-11T08:14:08+09:00 Subject: Re: Reply wasn't posted; will test new post David A. Black wrote: > > > Meanwhile, I think Dennis is implementing the dummy-message thing, so > that any messages without references will be sent through as answers > to a message that exists for that purpose. This is sub-optimal, from > the threading point of view, but at least gets the posts through. > First evidence of that is Austin's post that you're replying to :-) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Austin Ziegler" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby Subject: Re: Reply wasn't posted; will test new post Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 01:36:20 +0900 Message-ID: <04232E9E93B2D54FB1DCCCFF8C4DDB6A188ECB@ev-exch01.corp.evault.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: neutron.zrz.tu-berlin.de X-received-from: This message has been automatically forwarded from ... X-Mail-Count: 103103 In-Reply-To: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think it would still work without the "In-Reply-To:" duplicate (if Dennis wants to try that next). It didn't break my threading but I don't get much trouble with that, anyway. It /does/ break out of the sub-thread, but that's no different to what would have happened before the change. It threaded by Subject:, then Date: which some people might find /preferable/ on news when reading a complete thread ? Good signs! -- Watching out for a reply from the OP (Botp Pe�a). daz ----- test reply - please ignore kind regards -botp -----