From: Kirk Haines <khaines@...>
Date: 2004-06-10T00:19:10+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Active Record 0.8.3: Modules, mapping, and transactions

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:15:37 +0900, David Heinemeier Hansson wrote

> * Fixed so transactions are ignored on MyISAM tables for MySQL
>    (use InnoDB to get transactions)

David, I'm curious about this design decision.  I went the exact opposite 
direction with transactions in Kansas.  Regardless of whether transactions 
are implemented at the DBD layer or by the database, transactions are always 
implemented at the object level.  I find it interesting that you went the 
other way, and am curious about the reasoning behind it?


Thanks.  Active Record looks like it is shaping up nicely!


Kirk Haines