From: Austin Ziegler <Austin.Ziegler@...>
Date: 2004-06-09T22:02:13+09:00
Subject: Re: Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck)

dblack@wobblini :
> Since Interface is already the name of a Ruby library, pretty much any
> other word (as long as it doesn't similarly shadow an existing
> package) is automatically more suitable than Interface.  
> 
> "Interfaces" and "Interfacer" come to mind -- not plum names, perhaps,
> but (as far as I know) unambiguous and unclaimed in Ruby-space.

ImplementsInterface ?


-austin
--
austin ziegler * austin.ziegler@evault.com