From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2004-06-03T07:11:31+09:00
Subject: Re: [rcr] supply option hash to Regexp.new

Hi --

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Simon Strandgaard wrote:

> Robert Klemme wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > 
> > "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@adslhome.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > news:20040602230945.768b8989.neoneye@adslhome.dk...
> > > Regexp.new is old, and relies on C'ish magic values.
> > >
> > > Lets write something ugly with the current initialize:
> > > Regexp.new('a.*a', 5, 'U')
> > > Thats the same as /a.*a/uxim
> 
> Robert, +1 ??

I think +1 means "I vote yes" (or in this case perhaps, "I will vote
yes when the RCR is submitted on RCRchive" :-)

I also like the idea of discarding these cryptic Regexp things.  


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net