[#101991] Gateway appears to be working!! — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

13 messages 2004/06/01

[#102028] What is the equivalent of Python's "%s" % "MyString"? — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

20 messages 2004/06/01

[#102050] Obfuscating Ruby Code. — "Ken Hilton" <kenosis@...>

Does anyone know of a Ruby source code obfuscator that's reliable and

56 messages 2004/06/01

[#102170] Floating point division operator /. (or fdiv method) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

31 messages 2004/06/02
[#102247] Re: [RCR] Floating point division operator /. (or fdiv method) — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/06/03

[#102231] Reply wasn't posted; will test new post — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Hi ALL:

38 messages 2004/06/03
[#102236] Re: Reply wasn't posted; will test new post — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/06/03

[#102241] Re: Reply wasn't posted; will test new post — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/03

Hi --

[#102366] Active Record 0.8.2: Inheritable callback ques — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Active Record 0.8.2?

13 messages 2004/06/04

[#102401] Problem Installing Ruby Gems 0.4.0 on XP not segfault — "Ernie" <erne@...>

I get the following error I'm running Ruby 1.8 windows version installed

10 messages 2004/06/04

[#102412] Check assertion in Ruby — Edgardo Hames <ehames@...>

Hi, everybody. I would like to use an assert like function to test the

20 messages 2004/06/04

[#102431] How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

I need to detect when an object is a hash-like container for other objects,

137 messages 2004/06/05
[#102465] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com> 2004/06/05

il Sat, 5 Jun 2004 11:15:37 +0900, "Sean O'Dell" <sean@celsoft.com> ha

[#102509] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2004/06/05

[#102516] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/06

On Saturday 05 June 2004 15:01, John W. Long wrote:

[#102456] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/06/05

[#102495] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/05

On Saturday 05 June 2004 02:28, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#102496] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/06/05

[#102499] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/05

On Saturday 05 June 2004 10:39, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#102507] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/06/05

[#102514] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/06

On Saturday 05 June 2004 13:30, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#102530] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "John W. Long" <ng@...> 2004/06/06

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#102535] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/06

On Saturday 05 June 2004 21:05, John W. Long wrote:

[#102563] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com> 2004/06/06

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#102573] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/06

Hi --

[#102649] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Dave Burt" <burtdav@...> 2004/06/07

param.respond_to? '[]' and

[#102445] class A::B verses module A ; class B — quixoticsycophant@... (Jeff Mitchell)

module A

14 messages 2004/06/05

[#102597] Segfault on embedded ruby. — Godot <garciamj@...>

16 messages 2004/06/06

[#102601] Instiki 0.9.0: Rendering improvements, Latex integration, OS X version — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Instiki 0.9.0?

9 messages 2004/06/06

[#102675] Waiting for condor output files — Milo Thurston <nospam@...>

I've got a script that submits a whole load of condor jobs, and has to

11 messages 2004/06/07

[#102710] Re: How to ducktype a Hash? — "Austin Ziegler" <Austin.Ziegler@...>

> dblack@wobblini.evault.com

18 messages 2004/06/07

[#102716] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Kloubakov, Yura" <YKloubakov@...>

22 messages 2004/06/07
[#102729] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Monday 07 June 2004 16:13, Kloubakov, Yura wrote:

[#102789] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/08

> I've worked with some fresh guys right

[#102796] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 07:55, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102808] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/08

> Non-college grads, though, never got hired unless they could prove their

[#102819] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 10:03, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102822] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/06/08

On Wednesday, 9 June 2004 at 3:52:21 +0900, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#102823] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/08

>

[#102824] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 12:12, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102731] Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

Semantics, James Thurber notwithstanding, is not a town in Ohio.

34 messages 2004/06/08
[#102814] Re: Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger) 2004/06/08

"Sean O'Dell" <sean@celsoft.com> wrote in message news:<200406080736.32485.sean@celsoft.com>...

[#102818] Re: Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/08

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 11:23, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#102839] Re: Interfaces and semantics (or, how to hashpipe a duck) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/08

Hi --

[#102788] ruby and mustard — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

20 messages 2004/06/08

[#102817] Ruby/Interface — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

Ruby/Interface 0.1-1

18 messages 2004/06/08

[#102863] oddities with select — Ben Giddings <bg-rubytalk@...>

I'm trying to use Ruby to talk to an network application, and noticed

21 messages 2004/06/08

[#102890] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Gennady [mailto:gfb@tonesoft.com] wrote:

39 messages 2004/06/09
[#102891] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/06/09

On Wednesday, 9 June 2004 at 11:46:12 +0900, "Pe?a, Botp" wrote:

[#102896] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Dan Tapp <dhtapp@..._sig_line.com> 2004/06/09

Jim Freeze wrote:

[#102900] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/09

I'd be afraid to hire a code-monkey who said yes.

[#102929] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/06/09

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 01:21, Tyler Zesiger wrote:

[#102930] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/09

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 22:48:30 +0900, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

[#102931] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2004/06/09

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 09:56, Michael Campbell wrote:

[#102934] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/06/09

On Wednesday, 9 June 2004 at 23:02:22 +0900, Tom Copeland wrote:

[#102978] Re: [OT] Re: Unit tests ... not just for the young — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2004/06/09

At 23:21 09/06/2004 +0900, you wrote:

[#102914] strip DOS ^Ms? — Dick Davies <rasputnik@...>

15 messages 2004/06/09

[#102922] Active Record 0.8.3: Modules, mapping, and transactions — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...>

What's new in Active Record 0.8.3?

12 messages 2004/06/09

[#102950] #include <re.h> required for Opteron but not Pentium. — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi

14 messages 2004/06/09
[#103007] Re: #include <re.h> required for Opteron but not Pentium. — Tim Hunter <cyclists@...> 2004/06/09

On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 03:58:55 +0900, Jim Freeze wrote:

[#102951] History of Languages poster from O'Reilly — djberg96@... (Daniel Berger)

Hi all,

12 messages 2004/06/09

[#103072] Graphing 2Ds in Python is pretty easy... — piir@... (Todd Gardner)

Hello everyone,

16 messages 2004/06/10

[#103172] Array#rest — Charles Comstock <cc1@...>

I find myself frequently using array slice of 1..-1, to pass the rest of an

25 messages 2004/06/11

[#103217] Switch to .ruby extension? — doodpants@... (Karl von Laudermann)

The current convention for Ruby source file names is to end them with

72 messages 2004/06/11
[#103228] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/11

The obsessive levels of abbreviation in the *nix world infuriate me.

[#103239] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — Mark Hubbart <discord@...> 2004/06/11

[#103246] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/11

I think I may be earning myself a reputation as a user-friendliness

[#103252] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/06/11

[#103258] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? [OT] — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/11

[#103580] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "SER" <ser@...> 2004/06/14

> I remember when I first started using linux (now I use FreeBSD, which

[#103599] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Tyler Zesiger <mailing-lists@...> 2004/06/14

I don't know how much of the thread you read through, but I repeated at

[#103602] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Monday 14 June 2004 16:13, Tyler Zesiger wrote:

[#103605] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Zach Dennis" <zdennis@...> 2004/06/14

>Most programmers

[#103608] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/15

On Monday 14 June 2004 16:46, Zach Dennis wrote:

[#103618] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/06/15

Quoteing sean@celsoft.com, on Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:40:26AM +0900:

[#103622] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/15

On Monday 14 June 2004 19:09, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#103673] Re: Switch to .ruby extension? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2004/06/15

Wrote Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com>, on Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:36:18AM +0900:

[#103225] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...>

Battery is a unit testing framework for Ruby. It captures all standard error

61 messages 2004/06/11
[#103236] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/11

Hi --

[#103250] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/11

On Friday 11 June 2004 11:47, David A. Black wrote:

[#103267] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/12

Hi --

[#103275] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/12

On Friday 11 June 2004 18:08, David A. Black wrote:

[#103308] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/12

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#103329] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/12

On Saturday 12 June 2004 03:49, David A. Black wrote:

[#103353] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/06/12

> arbitrary:

[#103366] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/12

On Saturday 12 June 2004 13:34, David A. Black wrote:

[#103389] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — Jean-Hugues ROBERT <jean_hugues_robert@...> 2004/06/13

At 08:12 13/06/2004 +0900, you wrote:

[#103525] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Sunday 13 June 2004 00:13, Jean-Hugues ROBERT wrote:

[#103533] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...> 2004/06/14

Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#103536] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Monday 14 June 2004 09:27, James Britt wrote:

[#103412] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/06/13

On Jun 12, 2004, at 12:28, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#103413] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...> 2004/06/13

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

[#103532] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/14

On Sunday 13 June 2004 07:52, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#103293] Any way to get the calling method's binding? — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Something I've wanted to do on a few occasions recently is to evaluate

13 messages 2004/06/12

[#103328] OpenSSL: patch — Jamis Buck <jgb3@...>

Attached is a patch for the Ruby/OpenSSL module, done against the code

25 messages 2004/06/12

[#103334] undefine — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...>

is there a way to undefine a variable?

43 messages 2004/06/12
[#103405] Re: undefine — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2004/06/13

[#103438] undefine — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/06/13

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:08:48 +0900, you wrote:

[#103465] Re: undefine — Claus Spitzer <DocBoobenstein@...> 2004/06/14

Again, this is where it's useful to consider the OO approach and think

[#103550] undefine — tony summerfelt <snowzone5@...> 2004/06/14

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:18:32 +0900, you wrote:

[#103560] Re: undefine — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2004/06/14

> i just need the variable to 'not exist' however it's thought about (by

[#103335] "www.ruby-lang.org" still down for maintenance - thats not good — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2004/06/12

[#103381] Ruby /.'ted — Dan Tapp <dhtapp@..._sig_line.com>

Ruby was just slashdotted under "Developers: Searching for the Best

14 messages 2004/06/13

[#103404] How to read a .csv file into a 2D array? — piir@... (Todd Gardner)

Hello everyone,

16 messages 2004/06/13

[#103468] Non-standard library project — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

Hi all,

28 messages 2004/06/14

[#103650] "Litte Ruby" book — Csaba Henk <csaba@..._for_avoiding_spam.org>

The book (or book-germ) entitled "A Little Ruby, A Lot of Objects" was

15 messages 2004/06/15

[#103697] a newbie question about main, Object... — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

14 messages 2004/06/15

[#103742] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Austin Ziegler" <Austin.Ziegler@...>

Sean O'Dell [mailto:sean@celsoft.com] :

17 messages 2004/06/15
[#103744] Re: [ANN] celsoft.com/Battery 0.1.1 — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/15

On Tuesday 15 June 2004 13:53, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#103874] Bidirectional named pipes on Linux — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

12 messages 2004/06/16

[#103930] introducing Hash-like mixin — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

17 messages 2004/06/17

[#103974] the new great computer language shootout — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

26 messages 2004/06/17
[#103975] Re: the new great computer language shootout — Lennon Day-Reynolds <rcoder@...> 2004/06/17

Part of the speedup appears to be from their use of the Psyco JIT

[#103986] Re: the new great computer language shootout — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/06/17

Lennon Day-Reynolds (rcoder@gmail.com) wrote:

[#103992] Re: the new great computer language shootout — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/06/17

Eric Hodel (drbrain@segment7.net) wrote:

[#103977] How to make generic #== method? — Zakaria <zakaria@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/06/17

[#103993] Generating "real-time" 2D line plots in Windows 2k? — piir@... (Todd Gardner)

Hello everyone,

11 messages 2004/06/17

[#104182] rubys web performance — Florian Weber <csshsh@...>

hi!

31 messages 2004/06/20

[#104222] About top-level method — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

15 messages 2004/06/21

[#104272] A question about Class and Object — "Sam Sungshik Kong" <ssk@...>

Hello!

18 messages 2004/06/21

[#104364] Newbie question - how to replace multiple whitespace within a string? — Brian Tully <btully@...>

Sorry if this is too basic a question but I just inherited a handful of Ruby

10 messages 2004/06/22

[#104455] rubygems thoughts — Hans Fugal <fugalh@...>

My participation here is sporadic at best, so forgive me if these

34 messages 2004/06/24
[#104459] Re: rubygems thoughts — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/06/24

[#104465] Re: rubygems thoughts — Hans Fugal <hfugal@...> 2004/06/24

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#104466] Re: rubygems thoughts — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/24

On Thursday 24 June 2004 10:18, Hans Fugal wrote:

[#104494] Is it considered Harmful? — "rolo" <rohitlodha@...>

Hi

133 messages 2004/06/24
[#104495] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/24

On Thursday 24 June 2004 16:15, rolo wrote:

[#104498] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2004/06/24

Sean O'Dell (sean@celsoft.com) wrote:

[#104499] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "rolo" <rohitlodha@...> 2004/06/25

> Sean O'Dell (sean@celsoft.com) wrote:

[#104787] Re: [OT] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2004/06/28

Hi,

[#104500] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/25

On Thursday 24 June 2004 17:23, rolo wrote:

[#104526] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/25

>>>>> "S" == Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104539] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/25

On Friday 25 June 2004 02:19, ts wrote:

[#104542] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/06/25

[#104587] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/25

On Friday 25 June 2004 08:57, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#104636] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/26

>>>>> "S" == Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104646] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/26

On Saturday 26 June 2004 04:19, ts wrote:

[#104663] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — ts <decoux@...> 2004/06/27

>>>>> "S" == Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104694] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 01:41, ts wrote:

[#104699] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

I think that #become and #class= are _theoretically_ wrong. Such a

[#104700] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 13:44, Patrick May wrote:

[#104701] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday, June 27, 2004, at 05:20 PM, Sean O'Dell wrote:

[#104706] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 14:48, Patrick May wrote:

[#104710] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

Sean,

[#104712] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/27

On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:43, Patrick May wrote:

[#104714] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/27

[#104715] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Sunday 27 June 2004 16:53, Patrick May wrote:

[#104716] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/28

[#104724] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Sunday 27 June 2004 17:30, Patrick May wrote:

[#104754] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Patrick May <patrick@...> 2004/06/28

Sean,

[#104763] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Monday 28 June 2004 05:45, Patrick May wrote:

[#104764] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Mikael Brockman <phubuh@...> 2004/06/28

"Sean O'Dell" <sean@celsoft.com> writes:

[#104766] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Monday 28 June 2004 08:33, Mikael Brockman wrote:

[#104767] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2004/06/28

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:58:22 +0900, Sean O'Dell <sean@celsoft.com> wrote:

[#104769] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Sean O'Dell" <sean@...> 2004/06/28

On Monday 28 June 2004 09:27, Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#104533] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — Scott Rubin <srubin@...> 2004/06/25

I can't possibly imagine it being useful to do this except when the

[#104535] Re: Is it considered Harmful? — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2004/06/25

[#104501] Building Ruby on AIX -- again — Matt Lawrence <matt@...>

I finally have a stable system to use to try to build Ruby. Here's the

18 messages 2004/06/25
[#104510] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — nobu.nokada@... 2004/06/25

Hi,

[#104511] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — Matt Lawrence <matt@...> 2004/06/25

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#104512] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — nobu.nokada@... 2004/06/25

Hi,

[#104513] Re: Building Ruby on AIX -- again — Matt Lawrence <matt@...> 2004/06/25

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#104601] OSCON Ruby tutorials cancelled? — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

14 messages 2004/06/25

[#104637] SQLite-Ruby and "other chrs" — Meino Christian Cramer <Meino.Cramer@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2004/06/26

[#104649] Writing UNIX 'wc' program — "@*(&SPAM&)*optonline.net" <" kboruff\""@*.*optonline.net>

Hey all,

13 messages 2004/06/27

[#104737] (oddity) applying objects with #call() implicitly — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>

Hi gurus and nubys,

16 messages 2004/06/28

[#104864] arrayfields-3.0.0 — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

URLS:

16 messages 2004/06/29

Re: [ANN] Active Record 0.8.0: Transaction that!

From: Carl Youngblood <carl@...>
Date: 2004-06-02 15:34:10 UTC
List: ruby-talk #102152
David Heinemeier Hansson wrote:

> Be aware, though, that the objects will not have their instance data  
> returned to their state before the transaction started. You鼠l have 
> to  deal with that yourself (just as in the case of Validations). Also 
> have  in mind that exceptions thrown within a transaction block will 
> be  propagated (after triggering the ROLLBACK), so you should be ready 
> to  catch those in your application code. 

Is this for performance reasons?  It seems like it wouldn't be too hard 
to undo the changes to instance data if an exception were thrown.

Carl

--------------ms040301010906050902030801
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIPxjCC
BMgwggQxoAMCAQICBAIAApswDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwRTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNV
BAoTD0dURSBDb3Jwb3JhdGlvbjEcMBoGA1UEAxMTR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3QgUm9vdDAeFw0w
MjA4MjcxOTA3MDBaFw0wNjAyMjMyMzU5MDBaMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMO
Q29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQL
Ez1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9y
ZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyND
b21vZG8gQ2xhc3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAD
ggEPADCCAQoCggEBALEeYGbgQwaeJ2gvApnHiN+F69tl7NRJZ3ouH83cFSzWHqzynUY6XQPA
PQUsWhgNWSVCo3LArSjSrTwx4ksH+16Y66gz1mmyWp7qLEmmJi5M8MyrQNKq3ixOgbW6e7hc
0Hu9R/XABtLA5NdH22JAr6EcUQMY27jQu5THPHnqJWSuJhnhPGZHZ5Kde1WrNMJ1btknjp2M
8B3aa5yGBKKQteqdjM/7OUOo8BgtnvcZECycL+HQsf/XWcTNQDL514HbURzyQVKBQbGDuMgJ
/pkiR4BPnMuu4CjVHKxwR7Alq6E4Qhdr+mpujV95+PYpAzCkbkbUhV2qQJk4dtseAX3lDKUC
AwEAAaOCAacwggGjMEUGA1UdHwQ+MDwwOqA4oDaGNGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHVibGljLXRydXN0
LmNvbS9jZ2ktYmluL0NSTC8yMDA2L2NkcC5jcmwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFPZSIhcVEwgDWb8YlZ9I
tLnp/vhmMIGSBgNVHSAEgYowgYcwSQYKKoZIhvhjAQIBBTA7MDkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFi1odHRw
Oi8vd3d3LnB1YmxpYy10cnVzdC5jb20vQ1BTL09tbmlSb290Lmh0bWwwOgYMKwYBBAGyMQEC
AQMBMCowKAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1AwWAYDVR0j
BFEwT6FJpEcwRTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD0dURSBDb3Jwb3JhdGlvbjEcMBoG
A1UEAxMTR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3QgUm9vdIICAaMwKwYDVR0QBCQwIoAPMjAwMjA4MjcxOTA3
MzFagQ8yMDA1MDIyMzIzNTkwMFowDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgHmMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAw
DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAtqewenGL4LqzgR42MnqGGNbxq005CHEGWmegSwHlMEBtibWe
Faqxx/QKxlwO6TfeqJfH3M7Ncft0AgfcXxUnCFMHdtS5BunCd1AeysmwwkaBgACtRKpc1iDZ
VTK+Vpbx6r2g47wNgDrqzPuaV+14pTY9VurR53TKNMPPsVHp4AwwggV5MIIEYaADAgECAhEA
0778lNvXcqTJcbJWukDeKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxFzAVBgNV
BAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQG
A1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNvbW9kby5u
ZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEsMCoGA1UE
AxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0EwHhcNMDMwNzA2MDAwMDAw
WhcNMDQwNzA1MjM1OTU5WjCB3zE1MDMGA1UECxMsQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsgLSBQ
RVJTT05BIE5PVCBWQUxJREFURUQxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9m
IHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIw
MDMgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0NhcmwgWW91bmdibG9vZDEjMCEGCSqGSIb3
DQEJARYUY2FybEB5b3VuZ2Jsb29kcy5vcmcwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGB
AKtIZSyfoppNIZm8EwguRgIMPh8Sohgro0UwKanm8DXCPiLWFd25/2WjoCB0VYUMXVEC7D+c
tvpruXiLH9lKuD2WNvdHUzr2EdyBP7uJ7Q7C4lMpIjQRtYCOeSH3CeZcy6FyLKZ8jOtV/BgH
fWsaX/z8u29bktnr1K18MCNIKq7RAgMBAAGjggGzMIIBrzAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBT2UiIXFRMI
A1m/GJWfSLS56f74ZjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUrG/w0IpUWEnwYe5gDksKWgjVwqcwDgYDVR0PAQH/
BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwIAYDVR0lBBkwFwYIKwYBBQUHAwQGCysGAQQBsjEBAwUC
MEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQEBMCswKQYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2Vj
dXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMIGwBgNVHR8EgagwgaUwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29t
b2RvLm5ldC9DbGFzczNTZWN1cml0eVNlcnZpY2VzXzIuY3JsMDqgOKA2hjRodHRwOi8vY3Js
LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DbGFzczNTZWN1cml0eVNlcnZpY2VzXzIuY3JsMC2gK6ApgSdDbGFz
czNTZWN1cml0eVNlcnZpY2VzXzJAY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgUg
MB8GA1UdEQQYMBaBFGNhcmxAeW91bmdibG9vZHMub3JnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQAR
powtW8sldyqXAfqn276jiYMlTBSX6BH1pjnIHNiYECywMi1txd8hRB3c/iHXCyAHuYq3AgRI
WegFJ+8/B1jGcUxDjvzmSSjnhFSztT1oNJZUrw0yYhdp+yWDjov24sKFFWYwC4rsnO0y6y9D
U9qAyrKk7NuwHp/NPR2tujpnvStgFLk3hvJTUj3Cu//+OXuqPwk6pIDYvnsGkISIkYfO8kQz
F39TAlNLkyBIsrzZdTotnSNlkwgzW1Ys62MRjZsC6zlrv2dMPxn0iyrxxtse3d82EF1Y53B/
hWvgGoQfQtnsz9bJSPbl9CvfMqPO/fRxGomUcOCSr7NPdoafve+JMIIFeTCCBGGgAwIBAgIR
ANO+/JTb13KkyXGyVrpA3igwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYD
VQQKEw5Db21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBE
BgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8u
bmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNV
BAMTI0NvbW9kbyBDbGFzcyAzIFNlY3VyaXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBMB4XDTAzMDcwNjAwMDAw
MFoXDTA0MDcwNTIzNTk1OVowgd8xNTAzBgNVBAsTLENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrIC0g
UEVSU09OQSBOT1QgVkFMSURBVEVEMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBv
ZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYyky
MDAzIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMRgwFgYDVQQDEw9DYXJsIFlvdW5nYmxvb2QxIzAhBgkqhkiG
9w0BCQEWFGNhcmxAeW91bmdibG9vZHMub3JnMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKB
gQCrSGUsn6KaTSGZvBMILkYCDD4fEqIYK6NFMCmp5vA1wj4i1hXduf9lo6AgdFWFDF1RAuw/
nLb6a7l4ix/ZSrg9ljb3R1M69hHcgT+7ie0OwuJTKSI0EbWAjnkh9wnmXMuhciymfIzrVfwY
B31rGl/8/LtvW5LZ69StfDAjSCqu0QIDAQABo4IBszCCAa8wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU9lIiFxUT
CANZvxiVn0i0uen++GYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFKxv8NCKVFhJ8GHuYA5LCloI1cKnMA4GA1UdDwEB
/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMF
AjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEBATArMCkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3Nl
Y3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCBsAYDVR0fBIGoMIGlMDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNv
bW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18yLmNybDA6oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2Ny
bC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18yLmNybDAtoCugKYEnQ2xh
c3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18yQGNybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIF
IDAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRjYXJsQHlvdW5nYmxvb2RzLm9yZzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEA
EaaMLVvLJXcqlwH6p9u+o4mDJUwUl+gR9aY5yBzYmBAssDItbcXfIUQd3P4h1wsgB7mKtwIE
SFnoBSfvPwdYxnFMQ4785kko54RUs7U9aDSWVK8NMmIXafslg46L9uLChRVmMAuK7JztMusv
Q1PagMqypOzbsB6fzT0drbo6Z70rYBS5N4byU1I9wrv//jl7qj8JOqSA2L57BpCEiJGHzvJE
Mxd/UwJTS5MgSLK82XU6LZ0jZZMIM1tWLOtjEY2bAus5a79nTD8Z9Isq8cbbHt3fNhBdWOdw
f4Vr4BqEH0LZ7M/WyUj25fQr3zKjzv30cRqJlHDgkq+zT3aGn73viTGCBF4wggRaAgEBMIHy
MIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENv
bW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1
c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAy
IENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8gQ2xhc3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2
aWNlcyBDQQIRANO+/JTb13KkyXGyVrpA3igwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAsEwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkD
MQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDQwNjAyMTUzMzU0WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0B
CQQxFgQU9DWshV7L7W0cnrVSU7eXyjhUutwwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0D
BzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwIC
ASgwggEDBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgfUwgfIwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21v
ZG8gTGltaXRlZDEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRl
cm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9z
aXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9k
byBDbGFzcyAzIFNlY3VyaXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBAhEA0778lNvXcqTJcbJWukDeKDCCAQUG
CyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYH1oIHyMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2RvIExp
bWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBh
bmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5
MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8gQ2xh
c3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQQIRANO+/JTb13KkyXGyVrpA3igwDQYJKoZIhvcN
AQEBBQAEgYAWJEjg0NfIaj0cjt6ON95G1U+9xrVijIVaxK90A2R4Xtr9OjruTWwrdaMrwkCh
PIWvviKFnvFF5Krv2flgxgHcb+Cuc94qTN0WS6FCmZWTc/4pO3k+ASlCDa7ArVoK3xnUizIX
pE/JHWF8ovyhGq6At57NUploeczw94jb+us3jAAAAAAAAA==
--------------ms040301010906050902030801--

In This Thread