From: Jim Weirich <jim@...>
Date: 2004-05-30T08:13:44+09:00
Subject: Re: Test::Unit: assert_follows_spec() (or something like that)

David Garamond wrote:
>> assert_array(expected, :func)
>> assert_inout(expected, :func)
> 
> Both are better than assert_follows_spec I think :)

How about:  assert_examples

-- 
-- Jim Weirich    jim@weirichhouse.org     http://onestepback.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)