From: Hal Fulton Date: 2004-05-27T03:42:43+09:00 Subject: Re: separating ruby-talk from comp.lang.ruby? Sean O'Dell wrote: > On Wednesday 26 May 2004 09:55, David A. Black wrote: > >>I don't think it's the gateway code. It's worked for years, basically >>until about 3-4 months ago. My tests (fairly barebones, but anyway) >>suggest that the gateway software is, in fact, passing along the >>messages in question. Something is happening further downstream. > > > Check Google. > > http://groups.google.com/groups?q=comp.lang.ruby+gateway+broken > > The Ruby news-to-ML gateway has had problems for nearly 3 years now by > Google's reckoning. Whether off and on, and for what all reasons, I don't > know. > > I think it should either be re-built with software that works, or the two > should be separated. There have been problems and bug fixes over the years, of course. But at present it's largely not a gateway software issue. I'm not aware of any bugs in the gateway code. It's more an issue of mail transmission and news propagation -- mainly the latter I think. The situation *might* be greatly improved by someone hosting the gateway who had access to a better news server. But I can't blame people for not wanting the hassle of maintaining this. Hal