From: Warren Brown <WBrown@...>
Date: 2004-05-27T03:33:05+09:00
Subject: Re: [RCR] Numeric#of

> The only possible change I would make would be
> in the name. Integer#to_enum
> This seems to follow and the other "to_xxx"
> named methods.

    Or to be even more precise, we could add Integer#to_range, since
that is exactly what Integer#to_enum would be doing.

    Of course, "5.to_range.map { ... }" isn't really that far away from
"(0...5).map { ... }", so I'm unconvinced that the language really needs
the new construct.

    - Warren Brown