From: gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...1.vip.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: 2004-05-26T06:54:14+09:00
Subject: Re: [RCR] Numeric#of

il Wed, 26 May 2004 06:28:32 +0900, Harry Ohlsen <harryo@zip.com.au>
ha scritto::

>Kent Dahl wrote:
>

>
>What about
>
>   them = 3.instances_of { Array.new }
>
>It's certainly more verbose than "of", but I think it reads well and the 
>user would understand precisely what to expect as the result.
>

not if you don't want instances, say:

them 3.instances_of {'foo'}