From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2004-05-14T19:52:00+09:00
Subject: Re: Question regarding rb_include_module

Hi,

At Fri, 14 May 2004 19:33:53 +0900,
daz wrote in [ruby-talk:100266]:
> <pseudo>
> #ifdef HAVE_FORK
> #  ifdef _WIN32
>       /* insert wizard fork stuff here instead of calling ... */
>       rb_notimplement();
> #  endif
> #endif

It should be:

#ifdef HAVE_FORK
    /* existing code */
#elif defined _WIN32
    /* insert wizard fork stuff here. */
#else
    rb_notimplement();
#endif

> The normal thing, IIUC, is to patch process.c and post it to
> ruby-core and nervously await the inevitable rejection :/
> (only joking -core).  But only the author(s) can do that.

At first, do you really want "fork", not open3 and so on, e.g.,
addition to Process.spawn?

-- 
Nobu Nakada