From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2004-05-13T17:50:44+09:00
Subject: Re: safe eval?

>>>>> "F" == Florian Gross <flgr@ccan.de> writes:

F> Heh, I don't actually regard this one as a bug of safe(), but more as 
F> one of Ruby. I'm uncertain if matz agrees, however.

 Well, it's not really important for me : I was just able to run code not
 expected. 

F> Actually, that's the reason of using a $SAFE-level of 5 and not 4 as one 
F> would probably expect. :)

 plruby run with $SAFE = 12 :-)


Guy Decoux