From: "uggsoutlet (uggsoutlet uggsoutlet)" Date: 2012-11-22T15:30:21+09:00 Subject: [ruby-dev:46586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #6694] Thread.new without block. Issue #6694 has been updated by uggsoutlet (uggsoutlet uggsoutlet). =begin would be an excellent rule. Such an attitude would emphasize (()) sharply the value of life. Every day we should with gentleness, vigor, hold (()) the heart of thanksgiving to life. But when the time for endless days, months and years passed in (()) front of us, we are often not the seed feeling. Of course, there is also " eat, drink, enjoy .458gyu854 =end ---------------------------------------- Feature #6694: Thread.new without block. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6694#change-33496 Author: ko1 (Koichi Sasada) Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada) Category: core Target version: next minor =begin = Abstract Support Thread.new() without block. Before: Thread.new(params...){|thread_local_params| ...} After: Thread.new(proc: lambda{|tl_params...| ...}, args: params..., other_thread_config...) = Background Thread.new creates new Thread object and run passed block in another thread immediately. Thread.new can receive parameters and pass all parameters to block. Thread.new(a, b, c) do |ta, tb, tc| # ta, tb, tc is thread local } There are some request to specify thread configurations such as stack size described in [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3187] (in this case, stack size for Fiber.new). However, we have no way to pass such thread configuration on the Thread.new(). = Proposal Allow Thread.new() without block. A block will be passed with proc parameter. Passed arguments will be passed with args parameter. # ex1 Thread.new(){...} #=> Thread.new(proc: -> {...}) # ex2 Thread.new(a, b, c){|ta, tb, tc| ...} #=> Thread.new(proc: ->(ta, tb, tc){ ... }, params: [a, b, c]) If you want to specify stack size, then: Thread.new(stack_size: 4096, proc: proc{...}, args: [a, b, c]) Note that I'll make another ticket for thread (and fiber) creation parameters. This change can be described with the following pseudo code: def Thread.new(*args, &block) if block Thread.new_orig(*args, &block) else config = args[0] || raise ArgumentError stack_size = config[:stack_size] # ... and process another parameters Thread.new_orig(*config[:args], &config[:proc]) end end = Another proposal On the [ruby-core:43385], Nahi-san proposed that if no block given on Thread.new(), then create "waiting" thread. Thread#run kicks waiting thread with parameters. th = Thread.new(thread_config_params) ... th.run(params){|thread_local_params| ... } We can combine with proc: parameter and this proposal. If Thread.new() doesn't have block and proc: parameter, then making a waiting thread. NOTE: Because we have already Thread#run, Thread#start is better than Thread#run? = Note I don't make any survey on other languages. Please give us your comments. =end -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/