[#41278] [BUG:1.9] BINARY should not be ASCII-compatible — Yugui <yugui@...>

WXVndWkbJEIkRyQ5ISMbKEIKCgo+IBskQiRHISIkKiQqJGAkTSQzJDMkXiRHJE41RE9AJEclKyVQ

15 messages 2010/05/11

[#41407] [Bug #3339] win32ole test failure — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Bug #3339: win32ole test failure

20 messages 2010/05/25
[#41411] Re: [Bug #3339] win32ole test failure — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2010/05/25

助田です。

[#41412] Re: [Bug #3339] win32ole test failure — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/05/25

こんにちは、なかむら(う)です。

[ruby-dev:41149] Re: Windows と DL が使用条件の libffi

From: Yugui <yugui@...>
Date: 2010-05-04 08:51:42 UTC
List: ruby-dev #41149
Sorry for replying so late.

2010/4/27 Aaron Patterson <aaron.patterson@gmail.com>:
> Yes, this is possible. =A0I think there might be an easier way though.
> I created "ext/fiddle" (FFI + DL sounds like "fiddle"). =A0Fiddle only
(snip)
> For systems with libffi available, DL will use Fiddle as the back end.
> =A0How is that?

cool. Does the way handles function calling conventions correctly?  If
so, I agree the way.
How about it? < unak

--=20
Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)
yugui@yugui.jp
http://yugui.jp

In This Thread