[#34011] Should --verbose be equal to -v ? — Yugui <yugui@...>

Yuguiです。

15 messages 2008/03/10
[#34012] Re: Should --verbose be equal to -v ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/10

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#34105] rational.rb, complex.rb and mathn.rb — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...>

rational と complex が組み込みになったことで、lib/mathn.rb の意義は薄

29 messages 2008/03/22
[#34106] Re: rational.rb, complex.rb and mathn.rb — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...> 2008/03/22

現時点で rational.rb と complex.rb を残しているのは、それが無難だから

[#34107] Re: rational.rb, complex.rb and mathn.rb — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...> 2008/03/22

で、かなり選択肢を絞った叩き台です。

[#34120] Re: rational.rb, complex.rb and mathn.rb — keiju@... (石塚圭樹) 2008/03/24

けいじゅ@いしつかです.

[#34125] Re: rational.rb, complex.rb and mathn.rb — Shin-ichiro HARA <sinara@...> 2008/03/25

原です。

[#34130] Re: rational.rb, complex.rb and mathn.rb — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...> 2008/03/25

> 私も Complex の組み込みは Rational とは比較にならないくらい、仕様が決め

[#34158] Complex組み込み — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...>

Complexが組み込みになるそうですが、これはcomplex.rbを踏襲して、

49 messages 2008/03/27
[#34161] Re: Complex組み込み — Shin-ichiro HARA <sinara@...> 2008/03/28

原です。

[#34168] Re: Complex組み込み — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...> 2008/03/28

> 今までの Complex は、complex.rb にほぼ残して、たとえば Rational 成分

[#34186] Re: Complex組み込み — Shin-ichiro HARA <sinara@...> 2008/03/31

原です。

[#34187] Re: Complex組み込み — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...> 2008/03/31

> そうです。Complex が難しい、という話を書いておくと、

[#34193] Re: Complex組み込み — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/03/31

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#34203] Re: Complex組み込み — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...> 2008/04/01

> |僕としては、/ 演算子の振舞いについて前向きに検討してほしいです。

[#34215] Re: Complex組み込み — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/04/02

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#34166] Re: Complex組み込み — Tadayoshi Funaba <tadf@...> 2008/03/28

> となるようですが、別の実装として、

[ruby-dev:33986] Re: Schedule for the 1.8.7 release

From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Date: 2008-03-03 21:09:04 UTC
List: ruby-dev #33986
Still packing..

At Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:41:23 -0500,
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> comments in line.
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi, developers,
> >
> > After seeing Ruby 1.9.0-1 released earlier today, I, as the release
> > manager of the 1.8 series, would like to announce here that it is time
> > to start working on the next release, 1.8.7.
> >
> > Below is the timeline I made up.  The reason for the slow start (long
> > period for discussion) is because I'm going on a week's trip next week
> > to Portland and Seattle.
> >
> > Schedule for 1.8.7: (subject to change as it proceeds)
> >
> >    Now - 2008-03-22
> >      Discuss what features should and/or can be backported, and get
> >      the release manager to make decisions as to which features are
> >      going to be worked on for 1.8.7.
> >
>
> In what forum are changes and features going to be discussed? ruby-core? As

Yes, ruby-core would be the best place to discuss in.

> for issues,
> see  http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/15231
>
> Alas no comments/discussion. If you want me to work up a patch, let me know.
>
> As for back-ports, I have the honor of submitting the first tracker request
> :-)
>
> http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=18517&group_id=426&atid=22040

OK, I've read the thread and the patch looks fair.  But, is what you
mean by "a patch" different than is attached to the request?

--
Akinori MUSHA / http://akinori.org/

In This Thread