[#22195] IO::for_io and TCPServer#bind — GOTOU Yuuzou <gotoyuzo@...>

test_drb が IPv4 射影アドレスが有効な環境でないと動かないこ

16 messages 2003/12/09
[#22198] Re: IO::for_io and TCPServer#bind — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/09

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22205] yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

StringIO の

24 messages 2003/12/10
[#22206] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — nobu.nakada@... 2003/12/10

なかだです。

[#22214] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/12/10

In article <200312100725.hBA7P8Ac011112@sharui.nakada.kanuma.tochigi.jp>,

[#22222] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — nobu.nakada@... 2003/12/10

なかだです。

[#22234] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — Masahiro Sakai (酒井政裕) <sakai@...> 2003/12/11

さかいといいます。

[#22262] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/12/13

In article <20031211.214041.71090239.sakai@tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp>,

[#22328] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/12/23

In article <87k751dzyf.fsf@serein.a02.aist.go.jp>,

[#22331] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/23

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22334] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2003/12/23

In article <1072167374.096702.13473.nullmailer@picachu.netlab.jp>,

[#22343] Re: yet another inconsistency about EOF between StringIO and IO — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/23

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22330] core dump with ungetc — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

次のように ungetc を使うと core を吐く場合があります。

14 messages 2003/12/23
[#22332] Re: core dump with ungetc — nobu.nakada@... 2003/12/23

なかだです。

[#22366] `to_s': method `to_s' overridden (TypeError) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

そういえば、次の `to_s': method `to_s' overridden (TypeError) というの

12 messages 2003/12/24

[#22385] Tk.callback_break causes seg-fault or hang-up — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...>

永井@知能.九工大です.

19 messages 2003/12/24
[#22387] Re: Tk.callback_break causes seg-fault or hang-up — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/24

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22393] Re: Tk.callback_break causes seg-fault or hang-up — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2003/12/24

永井@知能.九工大です.

[#22395] Re: Tk.callback_break causes seg-fault or hang-up — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/24

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22396] Re: Tk.callback_break causes seg-fault or hang-up — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/24

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22397] Re: Tk.callback_break causes seg-fault or hang-up — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2003/12/24

永井@知能.九工大です.

[#22418] ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 11.11 — MIYAMUKO Katsuyuki <k-miyamuko@...>

みやむこです。

29 messages 2003/12/25
[#22419] Re: ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 11.11 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/25

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22420] Re: ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 11.11 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2003/12/25

まつもと ゆきひろです

[#22424] Re: ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 11.11 — MIYAMUKO Katsuyuki <k-miyamuko@...> 2003/12/25

みやむこです。

[#22491] Re: ruby-1.8.1 build failed on HP-UX 11.11 — MIYAMUKO Katsuyuki <k-miyamuko@...> 2004/01/05

みやむこです。

[ruby-dev:22353] Re: pack('N') broken on 64bit platforms

From: Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Date: 2003-12-23 16:07:05 UTC
List: ruby-dev #22353
青木です。

  In mail "[ruby-dev:22352] Re: pack('N') broken on 64bit platforms"
    matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:

> まつもと ゆきひろです

> |Sparc64では
> 
> |動くようです。エンディアンの違いかなあ。
> 
> そのようです。alpha-linuxなマシンでは再現しました。以下のパッ
> チが有効そうです。試してみてください。

ありがとうございます。
直ったことを確認しました。

  aamine@asv800 % uname -srm
  NetBSD 1.6.1 alpha

  aamine@asv800 % cat t
  def f(n)
    p [n].pack('N')
  end
  f 1
  f 2
  f 3

  aamine@asv800 % ./ruby -v t
  ruby 1.8.1 (2003-12-22) [alpha-netbsd]
  "\000\000\000\001"
  "\000\000\000\002"
  "\000\000\000\003"

-------------------------------------------------------------------
青木峰郎

In This Thread

Prev Next