ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#1] Welcome to the ruby-core mailing list — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

2 messages 2002/05/10
[#2] Re: Welcome to the ruby-core mailing list — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2002/05/10

At Fri, 10 May 2002 17:54:29 +0900,

[#3] GC — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/05/11
[#4] Re: [Cleanup] GC — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/11

Hi,

[#5] Licence tags & tiny mini cleanup — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

1 message 2002/05/12

[#6] Warnings on Solaris — Lars Christensen <larsch@...>

2 messages 2002/05/13
[#8] Re: [patch] Warnings on Solaris — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/14

Hi,

[#7] Useless patch... — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2002/05/14
[#9] Re: Useless patch... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/14

Hi,
[#11] Re: Useless patch... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/14

Hi,
[#10] Re: Useless patch... — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/14

Hi,
[#12] Re: Useless patch... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/15

Hi,
[#13] Re: Useless patch... — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2002/05/15

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14] — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2002/05/15
[#18] Re: [BUG] — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/15

Hi,
[#28] Re: [BUG] — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/16

Hi,
[#15] Re: [BUG] — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/15

Hi,
[#16] Re: [BUG] — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/15

Hi,
[#17] Re: [BUG] — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/15

Hi,

[#19] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

11 messages 2002/05/16
[#20] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/16

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#21] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/16

Hi,
[#22] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/16

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#25] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/16

Hi,
[#23] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/16

Hi,
[#29] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/16

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#30] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/16

Hi,
[#24] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/16

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#26] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/16

Hi,
[#27] Re: [BUG] thread failure after trap — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/16

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

[#31] Ruby obsolete — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hello again,

5 messages 2002/05/22
[#34] Re: Ruby obsolete — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/23

Hi,
[#37] Re: Ruby obsolete — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/23

Hi,
[#38] Re: Ruby obsolete — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/23

Hi,
[#39] Re: Ruby obsolete — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/23

[#32] Long fmt? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/05/22
[#35] Re: Long fmt? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/23

Hi,

[#33] Array #2 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/05/22
[#36] Re: [Cleanup] Array #2 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/23

Hi,

[#40] ToDo details? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/05/23
[#41] Re: ToDo details? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/23

Hi,

[#42] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...>

32 messages 2002/05/25
[#43] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/26

Hi,
[#44] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/26

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#90] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#45] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/26

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#46] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/26

Hi,
[#47] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/26

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#48] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/26

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#49] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/27

Hi,
[#50] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/27

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#51] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/27

Hi,
[#52] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/27

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#53] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/27

Hi,
[#54] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/27

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#55] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/27

Hi,
[#56] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/27

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#57] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#65] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/28

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#84] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#92] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/29

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#93] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#94] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/29

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#95] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#96] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/29

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#99] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#100] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/29

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#101] RE: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/05/29

[#103] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/30

>>>>> "C" == Christoph <chr_news@gmx.net> writes:
[#97] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/29

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#98] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#181] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/21

Hi,
[#58] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/28

Hi,

[#59] yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

Would it be possible to add '-p ruby' to the bison command line args

8 messages 2002/05/28
[#60] Re: yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#62] Re: yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#61] Re: yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/28

> |Would it be possible to add '-p ruby' to the bison command line
[#63] Re: yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#64] Re: yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/28

> |All -p does is add a few #defines for build time at the top of the
[#66] Re: yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/28

> > |All -p does is add a few #defines for build time at the top of
[#68] Re: yyparse() and friends >> rubyparse() or rbparse()... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/28

Hi,

[#67] The warns-a-thon continues... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

I'm feeling left out in this race to clobber warnings!!! Attached are

19 messages 2002/05/28
[#69] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#88] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#89] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#91] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#81] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/29

> |*) lots of (a = f()) -> ((a = f())) warns cleanups
[#83] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/29

Hi,
[#87] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/29

> > > And, why did you include <ctype.h> in util.c?
[#70] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#71] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/28

> :*) Fixed some sprintf() format type mismatches
[#72] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/28

> > :*) Fixed some sprintf() format type mismatches
[#75] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#82] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/05/29

> > @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@
[#79] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/28

Sean, others,
[#73] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/28

>>>>> "S" == Sean Chittenden <sean@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#74] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#76] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#80] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/28

Hi,
[#85] Re: The warns-a-thon continues... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/05/29

Hi,

[#77] Long Fmt #2 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/05/28
[#78] Re: [Fix] Long Fmt #2 — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/05/28

On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 03:30:07AM +0900, Michal Rokos wrote:

[#86] rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

I'm doing a lot of work with Ruby in C and am using some of Ruby's

9 messages 2002/05/29
[#117] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/06/03

At the moment I'm writing an appendix Beginning Ruby Programming
[#119] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/04

Hi,
[#120] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/06/04

> > As for splitting out the declarations into its own header, that was
[#124] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — Chris Ross <chris@...> 2002/06/04

[#122] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/04

Hi,
[#128] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/06/04

> > > > As for splitting out the declarations into its own header, that was
[#133] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/05

Hi,
[#118] Re: rb_hash_has_key() and friends non-static... — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2002/06/03

Sean Chittenden wrote:

[#102] lib/complex.rb runtime warning... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

While using ruby-gnuplot I noticed that lib/complex.rb tosses up a

1 message 2002/05/30

[#104] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

29 messages 2002/05/30
[#105] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/30

Hi,
[#106] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/31

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#112] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/01

Hi,
[#113] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/01

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#121] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/04

Hi,
[#123] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/04

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#107] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/31

Hi,
[#108] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/31

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#109] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/31

Hi,
[#110] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/05/31

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#111] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/05/31

Hi,
[#125] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/04

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#126] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/04

Hi,
[#127] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/04

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#130] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/04

Hi,
[#132] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/05

Hi,
[#134] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/05

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#135] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/05

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#137] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/05

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#139] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/05

Hi,
[#141] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/05

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#138] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/06/05

Hi,
[#142] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/06

Hi,
[#155] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/07

Hi,
[#143] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/06

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#147] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — nobu.nokada@... 2002/06/06

Hi,
[#148] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/06

>>>>> "n" == nobu nokada <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:
[#140] Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops — ts <decoux@...> 2002/06/05

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

Re: possible bug: stack dump with <<-String, #{...} and large loops

From: nobu.nokada@...
Date: 2002-05-29 14:08:29 UTC
List: ruby-core #98 
Hi,

At Wed, 29 May 2002 21:52:54 +0900,
ts wrote:
>  But you can't use [ruby-core:00043] or [ruby-core:00053], because you
>  don't have a run time effect this is why you see a coredump in
>  [ruby-core:00090] 

[ruby-core:00090] means CVS head, not 00053.  It is merged both
of 00057 and 00043.  Thus, 00044 test should fail.

>  You have a coredump because ruby (for the second call) has not inserted a
>  place holder (0, 0) (this is the goal of NEW_DASGN(0, ...)) and when it
>  leave #times it remove all dynamic variables (even `a')

Yes, it's the problem of 00043.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread

Prev Next