From: nobu@... Date: 2019-12-24T01:31:50+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:96445] [Ruby master Bug#16437] Codespell report for Ruby 2.6.5 (and 2.7.0-rc1) Issue #16437 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). Thank you, yes, "exapmle" in test/openssl/test_x509name.rb is intentional to test malformed RDN by a typo. And for others: * Fixed the typos in debug_counter.h and error.c. * I see the word "unuseful" in some online dictionaries. * `spawnve` is an old function name provided by Microsoft and some platforms. * The URLs in "enc/x_emoji.h" come from NTT-DoCoMo Although the pages for developers in English seem no longer provided, its Japanese version has the same word. Maybe %-escape can avoid the false positive. * "lib/rubygems.rb" comes from the external library rubygems. * `PRES` stands for "private resident", an abbreviation in FreeBSD. ---------------------------------------- Bug #16437: Codespell report for Ruby 2.6.5 (and 2.7.0-rc1) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16437#change-83369 * Author: jschleus (Jens Schleusener) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.6.5 (2.7.0-rc1) * Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The FOSS server fossies.org offers a new feature "Source code misspelling reports": https://fossies.org/features.html#codespell Although such reports are normally only generated on request, as Fossies administrator I have just created (for testing purposes) an analysis for the current Ruby release 2.6.5: https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell.html That version-independent URL should redirect always to the last report (if available), so currently to https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.6.5.tar.gz/codespell.html Although after a first review some obviously wrong matches ("false positives") are already filtered out (ignored) please inform me if you find more of them so that I can force a new improved check if applicable. Just for information there are also two supplemental pages https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_conf.html showing some used "codespell" configurations and https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_fps.html showing all resulting obvious "false positives". Since a lot of spelling errors seem recently been fixed a similar check was done also for the new release candidate 2.7.0-rc1 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0-rc1.tar.gz/codespell.html Jens -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: