From: Jens.Schleusener@... Date: 2019-12-22T10:37:30+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:96405] [Ruby master Bug#16437] Codespell report for Ruby 2.6.5 (and 2.7.0-rc1) Issue #16437 has been updated by jschleus (Jens Schleusener). There was now also a check done for Ruby master but since the according tarball isn't embedded into the Fossies standard services a test folder was used: https://fossies.org/linux/test/ruby-master.tar.gz/codespell.html (https://fossies.org/linux/test/ruby-master-d76c8cf.191222.tar.gz/codespell.html) Additionally a codespell check was done for the new release candidate 2.7.0-rc2 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0-rc2.tar.gz/codespell.html Here the results for the currently used codespell configuration: spelling error Ruby occurences types 2.6.5 583 369 2.7.0-rc1 463 299 2.7.0-rc2 362 243 master d76c8cf 172 122 Although the numbers are not completely comparable it looks now much better! Not really understood I have the remark "Could you report other upstreams (rubygems, bundler, minitest, rake, test-unit, and unicode.org)" If that is addressed to me, I found separate tarballs only for rubygems and rake. The other mentioned ones appear to be partially contained in the main ruby tarball? Sorry, I'm not very familiar with the complete Ruby system. ---------------------------------------- Bug #16437: Codespell report for Ruby 2.6.5 (and 2.7.0-rc1) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16437#change-83330 * Author: jschleus (Jens Schleusener) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.6.5 (2.7.0-rc1) * Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- The FOSS server fossies.org offers a new feature "Source code misspelling reports": https://fossies.org/features.html#codespell Although such reports are normally only generated on request, as Fossies administrator I have just created (for testing purposes) an analysis for the current Ruby release 2.6.5: https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell.html That version-independent URL should redirect always to the last report (if available), so currently to https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.6.5.tar.gz/codespell.html Although after a first review some obviously wrong matches ("false positives") are already filtered out (ignored) please inform me if you find more of them so that I can force a new improved check if applicable. Just for information there are also two supplemental pages https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_conf.html showing some used "codespell" configurations and https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_fps.html showing all resulting obvious "false positives". Since a lot of spelling errors seem recently been fixed a similar check was done also for the new release candidate 2.7.0-rc1 https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0-rc1.tar.gz/codespell.html Jens -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: