[ruby-core:95558] [Ruby master Feature#16275] Revert `.:` syntax
From:
daniel@...42.com
Date:
2019-10-26 02:44:57 UTC
List:
ruby-core #95558
Issue #16275 has been updated by Dan0042 (Daniel DeLorme). matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote: > I am for adding syntax sugar for method reference. But I don't like proposed syntax (e.g. ->). > Any other idea? > Out of [ruby-core:85038](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13581#change-69758) candidates, `.:` looks best to me (followed by `:::`). > Let me consider it for a while. So clearly the syntax sugar for method reference is something that we *will* have. Eventually if not now. After the "let me consider", nobu implemented it with `.:` but was there ever a final word from Matz? ---------------------------------------- Feature #16275: Revert `.:` syntax https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16275#change-82336 * Author: naruse (Yui NARUSE) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- `obj.:method` is introduced at r66667 by #12125 and #13581. It encourages the functional programming style in Ruby. But this shorthand syntax is just for methods of `self` without arguments. It causes another feature requests like #16273 (and lambda compositions like #15428). Such features will introduce a new view of Ruby but no one illustrates the whole picture yet. I worried about such patch work may cause a conflict with future expansion of functional programing style or a just a garbage feature. `.:` syntax is introduced in 2.7.0 preview1, not released in production yet. How about reverting at this time and re-introduce with a big picture. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>