From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2003-04-07T01:44:09+09:00
Subject: Re: UnboundMethod#to_proc

Hi,

In message "Re: UnboundMethod#to_proc"
    on 03/04/07, "Chris Pine" <nemo@hellotree.com> writes:

|I'm sorry... but I don't understand!  :)

I shouldn't have used the word "check".  This must be much clearer than
my poor English.

							matz.

--- eval.c	4 Apr 2003 05:12:17 -0000	1.420
+++ eval.c	6 Apr 2003 16:42:28 -0000
@@ -7319,9 +7322,2 @@ bmcall(args, method)
 
-static VALUE
-umcall(args, method)
-    VALUE args, method;
-{
-    return method_call(0, 0, method);
-}
-
 VALUE
@@ -7345,3 +7341,4 @@ umethod_proc(method)
 {
-    return rb_iterate((VALUE(*)_((VALUE)))mproc, method, umcall, method);
+    rb_raise(rb_eTypeError, "unbound method cannot be executed; bind first");
+    return Qnil; 		/* not reached */
 }