From: mperham@... Date: 2018-05-16T20:12:44+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:87088] [Ruby trunk Feature#14718] Use jemalloc by default? Issue #14718 has been updated by mperham (Mike Perham). Yeah, it seems that way. Those results are with jemalloc 3.6.0 (which is what Ubuntu ships), a version 4 years old. jemalloc 5.1.0 is newest and might have space and time improvements. The arena tweak appears to solve much of the immediate fragmentation issue. ---------------------------------------- Feature #14718: Use jemalloc by default? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14718#change-72055 * Author: mperham (Mike Perham) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- I know Sam opened #9113 4 years ago to suggest this but I'm revisiting the topic to see if there's any movement here for Ruby 2.6 or 2.7. I supply a major piece of Ruby infrastructure (Sidekiq) and I keep hearing over and over how Ruby is terrible with memory, a huge memory hog with their Rails apps. My users switch to jemalloc and a miracle occurs: their memory usage drops massively. Some data points: https://twitter.com/brandonhilkert/status/987400365627801601 https://twitter.com/d_jones/status/989866391787335680 https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/issues/3824#issuecomment-383072469 Redis moved to jemalloc many years ago and it solved all of their memory issues too. Their conclusion: the glibc allocator "sucks really really hard". http://oldblog.antirez.com/post/everything-about-redis-24.html This is a real pain point for the entire Rails community and would improve Ruby's reputation immensely if we can solve this problem. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: