[#85349] [Ruby trunk Bug#14334] Segmentation fault after running rspec (ruby/2.5.0/erb.rb:885 / simplecov/source_file.rb:85) — pragtob@...
Issue #14334 has been updated by PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer).
3 messages
2018/02/02
[#85358] Re: [ruby-cvs:69220] nobu:r62039 (trunk): compile.c: unnecessary freezing — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2018/02/03
[#85612] Why require autoconf 2.67+ — leam hall <leamhall@...>
Please pardon the intrusion; I am new to Ruby and like to pull the
6 messages
2018/02/17
[#85634] [Ruby trunk Bug#14494] [PATCH] tool/m4/ruby_replace_type.m4 use AC_CHECK_TYPES for HAVE_* macros — normalperson@...
Issue #14494 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2018/02/19
[#85674] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — matz@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
5 messages
2018/02/20
[#85686] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/20
matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#85704] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/02/21
On 2018/02/20 18:06, Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:85474] [CommonRuby Feature#7747] googlefeud
From:
feudproject@...
Date:
2018-02-08 09:38:33 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85474
Issue #7747 has been updated by googlefeud (google feud).
Subject changed from Expanded API for Binding semantics to googlefeud
You can solve your issue by using [google feud answers](http://www-googlefeud.com/)
----------------------------------------
Feature #7747: googlefeud
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7747#change-70266
* Author: jballanc (Joshua Ballanco)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
=begin
Currently, the only way to create a new instance of Binding is to get a copy of the current scope's binding, or ask some other object for its binding. In either case, the binding object returned always has semantics identical to the original binding. In other words, a binding object used with eval is capable of (not necessarily an exhaustive list):
* redefining methods on the binding target
* defining new methods on the binding target
* getting/setting instance variables
* getting/creating new constants
This feature proposal would introduce a new mechanism for creating a binding and adjusting its relationship with the source binding. For example, if you have a class (({Foo})) defined like so:
class Foo
def say
puts "hello!"
end
end
Then you would be able to create a new binding that ((*won't*)) propagate new definitions to the parent binding like so:
new_binding = Binding.new(Foo)
new_binding.propagate = false
new_binding.eval("def shout; puts 'HI!'; end")
Foo.new.say #=> "hello!"
Foo.new.shout #=> No Method Error
new_binding.eval("Foo.new.say") #=> "hello"
new_binding.eval("Foo.new.shout") #=> "HI!"
If, additionally, we introduce a way to merge or combine bindings, then this API could actually be used to implement refinements in pure Ruby like so (note I am also assuming that (({Binding#eval})) gains the ability to take a block):
class Module
def refine(klass, &block)
@refined_bindings ||= {}
refinement_binding = Binding.new(klass)
refinement_binding.propagate = false
refinement_binding.shadow = true
refinement_binding.eval &block
(@refined_bindings[self.name] ||= []) << refinement_binding
end
def using(mod)
@refined_bindings[mod].each { |refinement| self.binding.merge(refinement) }
end
end
Following is the preliminary list of additional APIs I am tentatively proposing (though I expect this to change with additional discussion):
* (({Binding.new(an_object)})) - creates a new Binding object that "inherits" the binding of the argument; essentially equivalent to (({an_object.send(:binding).dup}))
* (({Binding#propagate}))/(({Binding#propagate=})) - boolean; determines whether new method, class, or Constant defs are propagated into the "parent" binding's scope
* (({Binding#shadow}))/(({Binding#shadow=})) - boolean; sets whether or not new values for existing methods/constants/variables can be set
* (({Binding#freeze})) - causes the Binding to capture all existing methods/constants/variables in scope at call time, and "disconnect" from the parent binding, so that any updates to definitions or values are no longer reflected into the "child" binding
* (({Binding#merge(other_binding)})) - combines the method/constant/variable bindings in (({other_binding})) with the receiver; effectively shadows the "parent" of (({other_binding})) within the receiver binding
=end
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>