[#84280] [Ruby trunk Bug#14181] hangs or deadlocks from waitpid, threads, and trapping SIGCHLD — nobu@...
Issue #14181 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
3 messages
2017/12/15
[#84398] [Ruby trunk Bug#14220] WEBrick changes - failures on MSWIN, MinGW — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14220 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2017/12/22
[#84472] Re: [ruby-dev:50394] [Ruby trunk Bug#14240] warn four special variables: $; $, $/ $\ — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Shouldn't English posts be on ruby-core instead of ruby-dev?
3 messages
2017/12/26
[ruby-core:84407] [Ruby trunk Feature#14217] Expose RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR or similar with patch level info for rc/preview as a constant
From:
dev@...
Date:
2017-12-22 17:07:15 UTC
List:
ruby-core #84407
Issue #14217 has been updated by shayonj (Shayon Mukherjee).
Agreed that it may appear as long. I chose this as a proposal, because it was already defined and was simpler to expose. Example:
~~~ diff
From 8cef26bbdf314dccf1d36984a49c35f0a815bbea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shayon Mukherjee <dev@shayon.me>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:51:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Introduce RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR constant
---
version.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/version.c b/version.c
index 4c7b1abb40..6c66c12eb0 100644
--- a/version.c
+++ b/version.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ const char ruby_version[] = RUBY_VERSION;
const char ruby_release_date[] = RUBY_RELEASE_DATE;
const char ruby_platform[] = RUBY_PLATFORM;
const int ruby_patchlevel = RUBY_PATCHLEVEL;
+const char ruby_patchlevel_str[] = RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR;
const char ruby_description[] = RUBY_DESCRIPTION;
const char ruby_copyright[] = RUBY_COPYRIGHT;
const char ruby_engine[] = "ruby";
@@ -59,6 +60,12 @@ Init_version(void)
* the patchlevel will be -1
*/
rb_define_global_const("RUBY_PATCHLEVEL", MKINT(patchlevel));
+ /*
+ * The patchlevel string for this ruby. If this is a development build
+ * of ruby the patchlevel string will be dev otherwise the respective
+ * rc or preview candidate.
+ */
+ rb_define_global_const("RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR", MKSTR(patchlevel_str));
/*
* The SVN revision for this ruby.
*/
--
2.15.1
~~~
IMO, ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR``` still makes sense since it differentiates it from ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL```, but at the same time I am not too big on the idea of having the the type of the return value in a constant name. I am more than happy to go with a different name. Few others I had in mind were ```RUBY_PATCHNAME``` and ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_NAME```.
----------------------------------------
Feature #14217: Expose RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR or similar with patch level info for rc/preview as a constant
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14217#change-68600
* Author: shayonj (Shayon Mukherjee)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
## Problem
When ruby is in release candidate or preview, ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL``` is ```-1```. Without parsing ```RUBY_DESCRIPTION```, its hard to tell using constant the right and absolute ruby version.
## Proposal
Expose RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR as a constant, just like ```RUBY_VERSION``` or ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL```. So that, we can know the right ruby version, especially when its in preview or release candidate. This is also helpful when using gems that rely on ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL``` and ```RUBY_VERSION``` to serve the right experience. Example: Bundler, which validates gem installation by making sure right ruby is installed. Currently, we cannot install gems using 2.5.0preview1.
~~~
Your Ruby version is 2.5.0, but your Gemfile specified 2.5.0preview1
~~~
This can be handled in bundler through some different wokraround, but I think by exposing ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR```, it will be helpful in building the appropriate solutions.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>