[#83773] [Ruby trunk Bug#14108] Seg Fault with MinGW on svn 60769 — usa@...
Issue #14108 has been updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA).
9 messages
2017/11/15
[#83774] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14108] Seg Fault with MinGW on svn 60769
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/11/15
usa@garbagecollect.jp wrote:
[#83775] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14108] Seg Fault with MinGW on svn 60769
— "U.NAKAMURA" <usa@...>
2017/11/15
Hi, Eric
[#83779] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14108] Seg Fault with MinGW on svn 60769
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/11/15
"U.NAKAMURA" <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#83781] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14108] Seg Fault with MinGW on svn 60769
— "U.NAKAMURA" <usa@...>
2017/11/15
Hi, Eric,
[#83782] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14108] Seg Fault with MinGW on svn 60769
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/11/15
"U.NAKAMURA" <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[ruby-core:83727] [Ruby trunk Bug#14097] Add union and difference to Array
From:
mame@...
Date:
2017-11-10 09:20:03 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83727
Issue #14097 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). I'm neutral to your proposal itself. My two cents: `Array#union` should return a new array instead of modifying self, and `Array#union!` should be its modifying version. ---------------------------------------- Bug #14097: Add union and difference to Array https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14097#change-67764 * Author: ana06 (Ana Maria Martinez Gomez) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Currently there is a concat method in ruby which does the same as +, but modifying the object. We could introduce a union and difference methods, which would be the equivalent for the `|` and `-` operators. This operators are normally less used due to lack of readability and expressivity. You end seeing thinks like: ``` array.concat(array2).uniq! ``` just because it is more readable. When it could be written like: ``` array |= array2 ``` But, as this is not clear for some people, the new method will solve this problem: ``` array.union(array2) ``` And now this is clean and readable, as everybody expect from Ruby, the language focused on simplicity and productivity. ;) Can I send a PR? :) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>