[#79440] [Ruby trunk Bug#13188] Reinitialize Ruby VM. — shyouhei@...
SXNzdWUgIzEzMTg4IGhhcyBiZWVuIHVwZGF0ZWQgYnkgU2h5b3VoZWkgVXJhYmUuCgoKTWFydGlu
6 messages
2017/02/06
[#79441] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#13188] Reinitialize Ruby VM.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2017/02/06
On 2017/02/06 10:10, shyouhei@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#79532] Immutable Strings vs Symbols — Daniel Ferreira <subtileos@...>
Hi,
15 messages
2017/02/15
[#79541] Re: Immutable Strings vs Symbols
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2017/02/15
Em 15-02-2017 05:05, Daniel Ferreira escreveu:
[#79543] Re: Immutable Strings vs Symbols
— Daniel Ferreira <subtileos@...>
2017/02/16
Hi Rodrigo,
[#79560] Re: Immutable Strings vs Symbols
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2017/02/16
Em 15-02-2017 22:39, Daniel Ferreira escreveu:
[ruby-core:79824] [Ruby trunk Feature#12901] Anonymous functions without scope lookup overhead
From:
rdmosolgo@...
Date:
2017-02-28 12:35:15 UTC
List:
ruby-core #79824
Issue #12901 has been updated by Robert Mosolgo.
I didn't think about (er, *know* about!) those ways of accessing the inner scope. That definitely rules out skipping the binding in those cases! Thanks for the info.
----------------------------------------
Feature #12901: Anonymous functions without scope lookup overhead
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12901#change-63260
* Author: Richard Schneeman
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
Right now if you are writing performance sensitive code you can get a performance bump by not using anonymous functions (procs, lambdas, blocks) due to the scope lookup overhead.
https://twitter.com/apotonick/status/791167782532493312?lang=en
I would like to be able to create an anonymous function and specify I don't need it to perform the lookup when called.
I am thinking that this code:
~~~
Proc.new(scope: false) {|var| puts var }
~~~
Would be the equivalent of
~~~
def anon(var)
puts var
end
~~~
If you call it while trying to access something from outside of the scope it would error
~~~
var = "hello"
Proc.new(scope: false) { puts var }.call
# => NameError: undefined local variable or method `var' for main:Object
~~~
An example of a case where this could be used is found in https://github.com/rails/sprockets/pull/417. In this case we are getting rid of anonymous functions in favor of a method created with refinements. This solution works but it was not an obvious optimization. It would be convenient to have a syntax for defining anonymous functions that do not need access to caller scope.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>