[#79440] [Ruby trunk Bug#13188] Reinitialize Ruby VM. — shyouhei@...
SXNzdWUgIzEzMTg4IGhhcyBiZWVuIHVwZGF0ZWQgYnkgU2h5b3VoZWkgVXJhYmUuCgoKTWFydGlu
6 messages
2017/02/06
[#79441] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#13188] Reinitialize Ruby VM.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2017/02/06
On 2017/02/06 10:10, shyouhei@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#79532] Immutable Strings vs Symbols — Daniel Ferreira <subtileos@...>
Hi,
15 messages
2017/02/15
[#79541] Re: Immutable Strings vs Symbols
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2017/02/15
Em 15-02-2017 05:05, Daniel Ferreira escreveu:
[#79543] Re: Immutable Strings vs Symbols
— Daniel Ferreira <subtileos@...>
2017/02/16
Hi Rodrigo,
[#79560] Re: Immutable Strings vs Symbols
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2017/02/16
Em 15-02-2017 22:39, Daniel Ferreira escreveu:
[ruby-core:79563] Re: Immutable Strings vs Symbols
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2017-02-17 00:37:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #79563
Daniel Ferreira <subtileos@gmail.com> wrote: > > For Ruby 3, I do not support frozen_string_literal becoming the > > default. I am 100% against breaking existing code. Too much > > 1.8 code was broken when 1.9 came out and Ruby lost users as a > > result. But it's not my decision... > > I thought it was already agreed that it would be the case. No. matz proposed it; but until Ruby 3 is released, I do not believe anything is set in stone. > Are you saying Ruby 3 may not break backwards compatibility? We do not know, yet. I don't make decisions about API but I will try to influence the others to avoid breaking compatibility. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>