[#78949] [Ruby trunk Feature#13095] [PATCH] io.c (rb_f_syscall): remove deprecation notice — kosaki.motohiro@...
Issue #13095 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
3 messages
2017/01/03
[#78997] [Ruby trunk Bug#13110] Byte-based operations for String — shugo@...
Issue #13110 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
3 messages
2017/01/06
[#79228] Re: [ruby-cvs:64576] naruse:r57410 (trunk): Prevent GC by volatile [Bug #13150] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
naruse@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2017/01/23
[#79511] Re: [ruby-cvs:64576] naruse:r57410 (trunk): Prevent GC by volatile [Bug #13150]
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/02/13
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
[#79518] Re: [ruby-cvs:64576] naruse:r57410 (trunk): Prevent GC by volatile [Bug #13150]
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/02/13
On 2017/02/13 10:04, Eric Wong wrote:
[#79298] [Ruby trunk Bug#13085][Assigned] io.c io_fwrite creates garbage — nobu@...
Issue #13085 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
3 messages
2017/01/29
[#79337] Re: [ruby-changes:45397] normal:r57469 (trunk): io.c: recycle garbage on write — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Eric:
4 messages
2017/01/31
[#79352] Re: [ruby-changes:45397] normal:r57469 (trunk): io.c: recycle garbage on write
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/01/31
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[ruby-core:79068] [Ruby trunk Feature#12957] A more OO way to create lambda Procs
From:
dsisnero@...
Date:
2017-01-12 17:07:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #79068
Issue #12957 has been updated by Dominic Sisneros.
I want this too
MyLambda = Class.new Proc
I want MyLambda{|x| x + 1}.lambda? to == true
I only want it when initializing the new lambdas. I want easy initialization with a block
Maybe allow Proc.new to accept true or false
class Proc
def initialize(lmbda = false, &block)
if lmbda
__lambda__ = true
end
block = block
end
end
then
class MyLambda
def initialize(&block)
super(true,&block)
end
end
MyLambda.new{|x| x + 1}.lambda? == true
----------------------------------------
Feature #12957: A more OO way to create lambda Procs
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12957#change-62478
* Author: Colin Fulton
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
Currently to create a lambda Proc one has to use `lambda { }` or `-> { }`. For doing metaprogramming it would be nice to have a more OO way to generate them. Something like `LambdaProc.new`. That way one could write:
```ruby
class MetaThingy
def initialize proc_class
@anonymous_function = proc_class.new do
# Some Code
end
end
end
```
and pass in either `Proc` or `LambdaProc` depending on their needs, instead of:
```ruby
class MetaThingy
def initialize proc_type
@anonymous_function = case proc_type
when :proc
proc do
# Some Code
end
when :lambda
lambda do
# Some Code
end
end
end
end
end
```
This is not a common use case, but would help make the language more orthogonal.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>