From: headius@... Date: 2016-09-09T01:20:33+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:77226] [Ruby trunk Feature#12086] using: option for instance_eval etc. Issue #12086 has been updated by Charles Nutter. > Yes, you'll get unexpected results in this case. I think you'd get unexpected results in my original case too, wouldn't you? Both of those two blocks still have the same prev_cref, which is where the refinements collection comes from. Am I wrong? In any case, even with the single Proc, it seems like a showstopper in this design. There's no way to avoid two threads refining the same block incompatibly. > It's true that cache is invalidated by instance_eval(using:), but global method caching has been improved in MRI, and I don't know how different compared to JRuby. What is the impact of that invalidation? I am not familiar with how MRI globally invalidates these days and how it reduces the impact. > I don't know it should be applied to code used with the new features. But if I have chosen not to use this feature, for the performance of my application, I'll also have to check every library I depend on to see if they use the feature. If I don't, such a library might impact the performance of my entire application. I don't think we want that. So summarizing my concerns up to this point: * The current design is not thread-safe. It might be possible to make it thread-safe at the cost of additional complexity, which may mean further reducing performance. (design issue) * If any code in the system uses the current implementation of this feature, that impacts the performance unrelated code by invalidating global caches. (implementation issue) * All blocks everywhere in the system will now be suspect; you will not be able to tell what method will be called unless you control everywhere that block will be passed (usability issue, in my opinion) ---------------------------------------- Feature #12086: using: option for instance_eval etc. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12086#change-60453 * Author: Shugo Maeda * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Currently refinements can be activated only in toplevel or class/module definitions. If they can be activated in block-level, it's useful to implement internal DSLs. How about to add a new option using: for Kernel#instance_eval and Moule#{class,module}_eval? ```ruby module FixnumDivExt refine Fixnum do def /(other) quo(other) end end end p 1 / 2 #=> 0 instance_eval(using: FixnumDivExt) do p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2) end p 1 / 2 #=> 0 ``` Proof-of-concept implementation is available at . In my previous proposal before Ruby 2.0, refinements used in a class or module are implicitly activated by instance_eval and class_eval, but now I think it's better to explicitly specify refinements to be activated. Considerations: * In the PoC implementation, refined methods are not cached inline, and thus it decreases the performance of refined method call. If there is a way to guarantee that blocks never be evaluated in different environments, refined methods can be cached inline. * {instance,class,module}_exec cannot be extended in the same way, because they take arbitrary arguments and there's no way to distinguish an option hash from the last argument hash. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: