[#76442] [Ruby trunk Feature#11741] Migrate Ruby to Git from Subversion — naruse@...
Issue #11741 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
3 messages
2016/07/19
[#76515] [Ruby trunk Bug#12610] webrick: protect from httpoxy — nagachika00@...
Issue #12610 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.
3 messages
2016/07/22
[ruby-core:76585] [CommonRuby Feature#12623] rescue in blocks without begin/end
From:
duerst@...
Date:
2016-07-27 08:11:37 UTC
List:
ruby-core #76585
Issue #12623 has been updated by Martin D端rst.
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> An objection is that `rescue` in `{}` block feels weird.
I feel the same way. I think it feels weird because in Ruby, program structures starting with a keyword (`if`/`while`/`do`/`def`/...) can contain keywords (`else`, `rescue`,...) and end with keywords (`end`), but symbols (`{}`, `[]`,...) and keywords are not mixed.
This, combined with the fact that `{}` is mostly used single-line, may suggest that adding `rescue` to `do` blocks might work, but not for `{}` blocks.
----------------------------------------
Feature #12623: rescue in blocks without begin/end
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12623#change-59810
* Author: Dmitriy Non
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Hi there!
There's pretty nice feature that we can use "short rescue" in method definitions:
~~~ruby
def my_method
raise '1234'
rescue
puts 'rescued'
end
~~~
What about using this in blocks?
~~~ruby
loop do
n = enumerator.next
# do something
rescue StopIteration
end
~~~
P.S. actually I am not sure if this FR was not created earlier but I couldn't google it.
P.P.S sorry for my english
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>