[#76442] [Ruby trunk Feature#11741] Migrate Ruby to Git from Subversion — naruse@...
Issue #11741 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
3 messages
2016/07/19
[#76515] [Ruby trunk Bug#12610] webrick: protect from httpoxy — nagachika00@...
Issue #12610 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.
3 messages
2016/07/22
[ruby-core:76320] [Ruby trunk Feature#12086] using: option for instance_eval etc.
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2016-07-08 12:58:39 UTC
List:
ruby-core #76320
Issue #12086 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
Shugo Maeda wrote:
> It looks cool, but there are two problems here:
>
> 1. We have to write `using RaddDjur::DSL` explicitly.
> 2. Refinements for DSL is available out of the grammar rules.
These seem irrelevant to `instance_eval`.
> If `instance_eval(using: refinement)` is introduced, RaddDjur::DSL can be activated
> only in the block given to `RaddDjur::Grammar.new`, and these two problems will be solved.
>
> Note that `instance_eval` and refinement activation have to be done atomically in this case.
> That's why I proposed this feature as a new option of `instance_eval`.
I don't think that a proc is evaluated under unpredicable context is a good idea.
`using(refinement, &block)` feels even better than it.
----------------------------------------
Feature #12086: using: option for instance_eval etc.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12086#change-59556
* Author: Shugo Maeda
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Currently refinements can be activated only in toplevel or class/module definitions.
If they can be activated in block-level, it's useful to implement internal DSLs.
How about to add a new option using: for Kernel#instance_eval and Moule#{class,module}_eval?
```ruby
module FixnumDivExt
refine Fixnum do
def /(other)
quo(other)
end
end
end
p 1 / 2 #=> 0
instance_eval(using: FixnumDivExt) do
p 1 / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
p 1 / 2 #=> 0
```
Proof-of-concept implementation is available at <https://github.com/shugo/ruby/tree/eval_using>.
In my previous proposal before Ruby 2.0, refinements used in a class or module are
implicitly activated by instance_eval and class_eval, but now I think it's better to
explicitly specify refinements to be activated.
Considerations:
* In the PoC implementation, refined methods are not cached inline, and thus it decreases
the performance of refined method call.
If there is a way to guarantee that blocks never be evaluated in different environments,
refined methods can be cached inline.
* {instance,class,module}_exec cannot be extended in the same way, because they take arbitrary
arguments and there's no way to distinguish an option hash from the last argument hash.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>