[ruby-core:75866] [Ruby trunk Bug#12297] Ruby stdlib date can parse non-existent date with year 0
From:
the.codefolio.guy@...
Date:
2016-06-06 22:48:56 UTC
List:
ruby-core #75866
Issue #12297 has been updated by Noah Gibbs.
Ah! It would be hard to "fix" Ruby's stdlib to not allow dates to have a 0 year in general, because of code like the Date test that can use a Date as a delta. That is:
class DateSub < Date; end
d2 = d - 1
assert_instance_of(DateSub, d2)
Things like DateSub can clearly have a 0 year, because that implies that the *difference* in years is 0, not that it's the year 0.
I think it still makes sense to fix strptime with the fix above. But I don't think Date or DateTime should disallow the year 0 in general.
----------------------------------------
Bug #12297: Ruby stdlib date can parse non-existent date with year 0
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12297#change-59038
* Author: t b
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v:
* Backport: 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN, 2.3: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Ruby date lib can parse date with year 0
`$ pry
[1] pry(main)> shitdate=Date.strptime('0000-01-07','%Y-%m-%d')
=> #<Date: 0000-01-07 ((1721064j,0s,0n),+0s,2299161j)>
[2] pry(main)> shitdate.year
=> 0
[3] pry(main)> `
There is no year 0 in gregorian and julian calendar between 1 BC and 1 AD
It should raise ArgumentError like it do when month/day number is 0.
---Files--------------------------------
no_year_0.patch (1.62 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>