[#75687] [Ruby trunk Bug#12416] struct rb_id_table lacks mark function — shyouhei@...
Issue #12416 has been reported by Shyouhei Urabe.
3 messages
2016/05/23
[#75763] [Ruby trunk Feature#12435] Using connect_nonblock to open TCP connections in Net::HTTP#connect — mohamed.m.m.hafez@...
Issue #12435 has been reported by Mohamed Hafez.
3 messages
2016/05/28
[#75774] Errno::EAGAIN thrown by OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock — Mohamed Hafez <mohamed.m.m.hafez@...>
Hi all, every now and then in my production server, I'm
4 messages
2016/05/30
[#75775] Re: Errno::EAGAIN thrown by OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock
— Mohamed Hafez <mohamed.m.m.hafez@...>
2016/05/30
Or does MRI's OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock just return
[#75782] Important: Somewhat backwards-incompatible change (Fwd: [ruby-cvs:62388] duerst:r55225 (trunk): * string.c: Activate full Unicode case mapping for UTF-8) — Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
With the change below, I have activated full Unicode case mapping for
4 messages
2016/05/31
[ruby-core:75780] [Ruby trunk Bug#9569] SecureRandom should try /dev/urandom first
From:
shyouhei@...
Date:
2016-05-31 00:37:58 UTC
List:
ruby-core #75780
Issue #9569 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe. Thank you for your interesting idea of OpenSSL being insecure. If you really believe so (and think you are a security expert), what you should do is actually fixing OpenSSL, not ranting here. Why I think it's OK to wait for upstream fix (be they Linux manpage or OpenSSL or whatever) is that the problem people argue is theoretical at worst. I don't think there is actual flaw yet. That doesn't mean there will never be, but I see no reason to urgent-fix this. If there is a real threat today, the picture drastically changes. Is there? ---------------------------------------- Bug #9569: SecureRandom should try /dev/urandom first https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9569#change-58966 * Author: Corey Csuhta * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * ruby -v: * Backport: ---------------------------------------- Right now, `SecureRandom.random_bytes` tries to detect an OpenSSL to use before it tries to detect `/dev/urandom`. I think it should be the other way around. In both cases, you just need random bytes to unpack, so SecureRandom could skip the middleman (and [second point of failure](http://sockpuppet.org/blog/2014/02/25/safely-generate-random-numbers/)) and just talk to `/dev/urandom` directly if it's available. Is this a case of just re-ordering the two code chunks so that `/dev/urandom` is tried first? Relevant lines: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/lib/securerandom.rb#L59-L90 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>