[#75687] [Ruby trunk Bug#12416] struct rb_id_table lacks mark function — shyouhei@...
Issue #12416 has been reported by Shyouhei Urabe.
3 messages
2016/05/23
[#75763] [Ruby trunk Feature#12435] Using connect_nonblock to open TCP connections in Net::HTTP#connect — mohamed.m.m.hafez@...
Issue #12435 has been reported by Mohamed Hafez.
3 messages
2016/05/28
[#75774] Errno::EAGAIN thrown by OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock — Mohamed Hafez <mohamed.m.m.hafez@...>
Hi all, every now and then in my production server, I'm
4 messages
2016/05/30
[#75775] Re: Errno::EAGAIN thrown by OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock
— Mohamed Hafez <mohamed.m.m.hafez@...>
2016/05/30
Or does MRI's OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket#connect_nonblock just return
[#75782] Important: Somewhat backwards-incompatible change (Fwd: [ruby-cvs:62388] duerst:r55225 (trunk): * string.c: Activate full Unicode case mapping for UTF-8) — Martin J. Dürst <duerst@...>
With the change below, I have activated full Unicode case mapping for
4 messages
2016/05/31
[ruby-core:75689] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#12416] struct rb_id_table lacks mark function
From:
Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Date:
2016-05-23 10:22:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #75689
On 05/23/2016 05:07 PM, Eric Wong wrote: > Do you have plans to hold arbitrary VALUE objects? Yes. I plan to post a feature request with a patch, that has a hunk to store an array into an rb_id_table. >> +++ b/iseq.c >> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ rb_iseq_mark(const rb_iseq_t *iseq) >> RUBY_MARK_UNLESS_NULL(compile_data->mark_ary); >> RUBY_MARK_UNLESS_NULL(compile_data->err_info); >> RUBY_MARK_UNLESS_NULL(compile_data->catch_table_ary); >> + rb_id_table_mark(compile_data->ivar_cache_table); > > Right now, ivar_cache_table only holds Fixnum which does > not need marking. Even with generational GC, I still prefer > we not waste CPU cycles walking through tables for noops. OK then, I give up this iseq.c hunk. Given the ability for this struct to hold GC-managed objects, I guess it is only a matter of time if someone actually do. People can use id tables that way now already with a custom mark function. I think it is a good idea to provide a default one for them, even if it has no actual usage today. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>