From: duerst@... Date: 2015-12-18T12:48:39+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:72365] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11840] Error with "make check" on Cygwin Issue #11840 has been updated by Martin D��rst. Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote: > Possibly, `sleep 0.2` is too short? I tried with 'sleep 1' first, and then with 'sleep 100', but no change. ---------------------------------------- Bug #11840: Error with "make check" on Cygwin https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11840#change-55658 * Author: Martin D��rst * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada * ruby -v: ruby 2.3.0dev (2015-12-17 trunk 53170) [x86_64-cygwin] * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Encouraged by Hiroshi Shibata's talk at Ruby Kaigi 2015, I tried "make check" on my usual cygwin compilation. If I understand the output below correctly, there was only one error in 1010 tests. If we can fix that error (or exclude the test if it doesn't make sense on cygwin or on Windows in general), then cygwin would pass the tests. ~~~ generating prelude.c prelude.c unchanged make[2]: 'rubyw.exe' is up to date. make[2]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/Data/ruby-public' make[1]: Leaving directory '/cygdrive/c/Data/ruby-public' test succeeded #254 test_fork.rb: F begin r, w = IO.pipe if pid1 = fork w.close r.read(1) Process.kill("USR1", pid1) _, s = Process.wait2(pid1) s.success? ? :ok : :ng else r.close if pid2 = fork trap("USR1") { Time.now.to_s; Process.kill("USR2", pid2) } w.close Process.wait2(pid2) else w.close sleep 0.2 end exit true end rescue NotImplementedError :ok end #=> "ng" (expected "ok") [ruby-core:28924] stderr output is not empty bootstraptest.tmp.rb:13:in `kill': No such process (Errno::ESRCH) from bootstraptest.tmp.rb:13:in `block in
' from bootstraptest.tmp.rb:15:in `wait2' from bootstraptest.tmp.rb:15:in `
' test_fork.rb FAIL 1/5 FAIL 1/1010 tests failed uncommon.mk:581: recipe for target 'yes-btest-ruby' failed make: *** [yes-btest-ruby] Error 1 -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/