From: "NARUSE, Yui" Date: 2015-12-15T13:06:11+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:72128] Re: [ruby-cvs:60264] duerst:r53112 (trunk): * enc/ebcdic.h: new dummy encoding EBCDIC-US > So, we should name as IBM037 for the realname, and cp037, > ebcdic-cp-{us,ca,wt,nl} and csIBM037 for aliese. Right? The canonical name of Ruby's encoding should be Preferred MIME Name. 2015-12-15 9:28 GMT+09:00 U.NAKAMURA : > Hi, > > In message "[ruby-core:72124] Re: [ruby-cvs:60264] duerst:r53112 (trunk): * enc/ebcdic.h: new dummy encoding EBCDIC-US" > on Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:39:26 +0900, duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp wrote: >> > But I want to know where the name 'EBCDIC-US' came from. >> >> The name came from http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets/character-sets.xhtml, as MIB 2078. > > Oh, I've just missed it ;-( > > >> > I guess this is the encoding that is named as 'IBM037' by IANA, >> > and it's aliases are 'ebcdic-cp-us' and so on. >> >> Looking at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1345, the code conversion is indeed much closer to ebcdic-cp-us than to EBCDIC-US. So using EBCDIC-US is definitely wrong. Thanks for pointing this out. > > Thank you for invesgating! > > So, we should name as IBM037 for the realname, and cp037, > ebcdic-cp-{us,ca,wt,nl} and csIBM037 for aliese. Right? > > > Regards, > -- > U.Nakamaura > -- NARUSE, Yui