[#70252] Re: [ruby-cvs:58640] nobu:r51492 (trunk): node.c: NODE_ALLOCA for ALLOCV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Besides possible backwards compatibility, can we drop volatile
3 messages
2015/08/05
[#70257] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI — ko1@...
Issue #11420 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
11 messages
2015/08/06
[#70337] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/11
Nice. Thank you guys for looking into this.
[#70349] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/12
Btw, did you consider using flexible array to avoid extra malloc
[#70355] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@...>
2015/08/12
I thought to suggest to embed hash_id_table directly into places when it is
[#70356] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/08/12
On 2015/08/13 4:29, Юрий Соколов wrote:
[#70358] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/12
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#70509] [Ruby trunk - Misc #11276] [RFC] compile.c: convert to use ccan/list — ko1@...
Issue #11276 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2015/08/21
[#70639] the undefined behavior of an iterator if it is modified inside of the block to which it yields — Daniel Doubrovkine <dblock@...>
(this is my first time e-mailing list list, so apologies for any misstep :)
4 messages
2015/08/31
[ruby-core:70391] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11446] [Open] Possible work around for the requirement to supplying arguments like this: .map(&:method, <arguments>)
From:
jikkujose+os@...
Date:
2015-08-14 16:40:16 UTC
List:
ruby-core #70391
Issue #11446 has been reported by Jikku Jose. ---------------------------------------- Feature #11446: Possible work around for the requirement to supplying arguments like this: .map(&:method, <arguments>) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11446 * Author: Jikku Jose * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Any chance this [work around](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23695653/can-you-supply-arguments-to-the-mapmethod-syntax-in-ruby/23711606#23711606) can be considered to be part of the language. Seems to be a pretty neat. NB: Matz seems to be interested in having this added: Check his [tweet](https://twitter.com/yukihiro_matz/status/632016695016620033). -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/