[#70252] Re: [ruby-cvs:58640] nobu:r51492 (trunk): node.c: NODE_ALLOCA for ALLOCV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Besides possible backwards compatibility, can we drop volatile
3 messages
2015/08/05
[#70257] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI — ko1@...
Issue #11420 has been reported by Koichi Sasada.
11 messages
2015/08/06
[#70337] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/11
Nice. Thank you guys for looking into this.
[#70349] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/12
Btw, did you consider using flexible array to avoid extra malloc
[#70355] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@...>
2015/08/12
I thought to suggest to embed hash_id_table directly into places when it is
[#70356] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/08/12
On 2015/08/13 4:29, Юрий Соколов wrote:
[#70358] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11420] [Open] Introduce ID key table into MRI
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/08/12
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#70509] [Ruby trunk - Misc #11276] [RFC] compile.c: convert to use ccan/list — ko1@...
Issue #11276 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2015/08/21
[#70639] the undefined behavior of an iterator if it is modified inside of the block to which it yields — Daniel Doubrovkine <dblock@...>
(this is my first time e-mailing list list, so apologies for any misstep :)
4 messages
2015/08/31
[ruby-core:70344] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11435] [RFC] iseq: implement memsize for wrapper
From:
ko1@...
Date:
2015-08-12 01:46:00 UTC
List:
ruby-core #70344
Issue #11435 has been updated by Koichi Sasada. It seems nice. We can also add RUBY_TYPED_WB_PROTECTED. BTW, I can change implementation of ISeq object in future. But now, your patch is reasonable. ---------------------------------------- Feature #11435: [RFC] iseq: implement memsize for wrapper https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11435#change-53760 * Author: Eric Wong * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- I noticed this was disabled in the recent refactoring. This patch implementation seems to return smaller sizes than I expected, so maybe that is the result of improvements and moving data around or likely I missed something. Only lightly checked, I'll check again another day/week or someone else can look at it. ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-iseq-implement-memsize-for-wrapper.patch (5.51 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/