[#68845] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11056] [PATCH] lib/net/*: use io/wait methods instead of IO.select — normalperson@...
Issue #11056 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/04/11
[#68945] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11083] [Open] Gemify net-telnet — shibata.hiroshi@...
Issue #11083 has been reported by Hiroshi SHIBATA.
4 messages
2015/04/21
[#68951] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11083] [Open] Gemify net-telnet
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/04/21
shibata.hiroshi@gmail.com wrote:
[#69012] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11105] [Open] ES6-like hash literals — shugo@...
Issue #11105 has been reported by Shugo Maeda.
5 messages
2015/04/29
[ruby-core:69003] [Ruby trunk - Bug #10871] Sclass thread unsafe due to CREF sharing
From:
evan@...
Date:
2015-04-27 21:34:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #69003
Issue #10871 has been updated by Evan Phoenix. Koichi, I think a workaround patch to be applied to 2.2 and 2.1 would be very useful. ---------------------------------------- Bug #10871: Sclass thread unsafe due to CREF sharing https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10871#change-52260 * Author: Evan Phoenix * Status: Open * Priority: High * Assignee: * ruby -v: 2.2.0p0, trunk * Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- When entering an sclass, the context is tracked via the same cref mechanism used for class and module, specifically on the iseq->cref_stack. The bug is that the cref_stack is the wrong place to put the new cref because the scope is specific only to that sclass body. Mutating and using the iseq->cref_stack causes any code that reads the cref via this cref_stack to incorrectly pick up the sclass instance instead of the proper scope! This is major thread safety bug because it means that all uses of `class << obj` are thread-unsafe and can cause random code to fail. Here is a simple reproduction of the bug: https://gist.github.com/evanphx/6eef92f2c40662a4171b I attempted to fix the bug by treating an sclass body the same as an eval, which already has special handling for cref's but I don't understand the code enough to make that change quickly. I believe this is a major bug and hope that ruby-core can address it soon. Thank you! -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/