[#64210] Asking for clarification for exception handling usage — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I've created a ticket for that but didn't get any feedback so I decided
[#64517] Fw: Re: Ruby and Rails to become Apache Incubator Project — Tetsuya Kitahata <kitahata@99.alumni.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
What do you think? >> Ruby developers
What benefits are there to this? I have a feeling that adding unnecessary
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 22:43:46 -0700
Here I am a Japanese. Before moving anywhere else answer to our question first: what benefits?
tax issue with each other.
Forgot to assert my opinions:
[#64614] cowspace (work-in-progress) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hi all, I started working on a cowspace branch. Based on the mspace API
[#64615] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10181] [Open] New method File.openat() — oss-ruby-lang@...
Issue #10181 has been reported by Technorama Ltd..
I like this feature.
On 08/28/2014 02:53 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/29/2014 12:55 AM, Eric Wong wrote:
Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@gmail.com> wrote:
[#64627] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10182] [PATCH] string.c: move frozen_strings table to rb_vm_t — ko1@...
Issue #10182 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#64671] Fwd: [ruby-changes:35240] normal:r47322 (trunk): symbol.c (rb_sym2id): do not return garbage object — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Why this fix solve your problem?
(2014/08/30 8:50), SASADA Koichi wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
(2014/08/31 0:18), Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:64202] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8429] Options requests in net/http should be able to accept a response body
Issue #8429 has been updated by Yui NARUSE. Priority changed from Low to Normal http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-4.3.7 ---------------------------------------- Feature #8429: Options requests in net/http should be able to accept a response body https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8429#change-48201 * Author: Chris Rice * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Yui NARUSE * Category: lib * Target version: current: 2.2.0 ---------------------------------------- As it is currently implemented, Net::HTTP::Options does not allow responses to OPTIONS requests to have a response body: class Net::HTTP::Options < Net::HTTPRequest METHOD = 'OPTIONS' REQUEST_HAS_BODY = false RESPONSE_HAS_BODY = false end According to ((<RFC2616|URL:http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html>)) section 9.2, responses to OPTIONS requests _may_ contain response bodies: "A 200 response SHOULD include any header fields that indicate optional features implemented by the server and applicable to that resource (e.g., Allow), possibly including extensions not defined by this specification. The response body, if any, SHOULD also include information about the communication options." As it currently stands, net/http is not useful for issuing an OPTIONS request to an http server which actually makes use of the response body. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/