[#5711] Lexic confusion: method/local variable distinction works strange — noreply@...
Bugs item #2371, was opened at 2005-09-04 00:40
Hi,
Mine is 1.8.2 and it does raise syntax error.
[#5732] Re: Ruby development issue tracking will go to basecamp — ville.mattila@...
[#5737] returning strings from methods/instance_methods — TRANS <transfire@...>
I was just wondering why with #methods and #instance_methods, it was
Hi,
On 9/8/05, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#5750] File.split edge cases — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5781] array sharing — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
This is my first time poking around in the ruby source code, so
[#5786] Difference between class declarations — Peter Vanbroekhoven <calamitas@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 9/15/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
[#5796] proposed attr writer patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
Daniel Berger wrote:
James Britt <ruby@jamesbritt.com> writes:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#5798] Makefile error in OpenSLL extension (on Windows) — noreply@...
Bugs item #2472, was opened at 2005-09-16 18:56
Hi,
This is the just released 1.8.3 preview2.
Hi,
No, win32/Makefile.sub doe not contain those two lines.
Hi,
On 9/18/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
Hi,
On 9/18/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
[#5844] Ruby 1.8.3 released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello Rubyists,
[#5848] Re: RubyGems in Ruby HEAD — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Chad Fowler wrote:
[#5851] Re: RubyGems in Ruby HEAD — Paul van Tilburg <paul@...>
Hi all,
I don't know if I can post to all those lists, but I'll leave them
Paul van Tilburg wrote:
Marc Dequ竪nes (Duck) wrote:
On 9/22/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
On 9/23/05, Pascal Terjan <pterjan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/23/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#5882] Re: RubyGems TODO — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Okay. I said in the main thread on ruby-core that I'm putting together a
On 9/22/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#5888] Re: RubyGems TODO — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:46:18AM +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
[#5898] Delegate and Forwardable Documentation — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I've tried to send these files through a couple of times now with
On Sep 22, 2005, at 9:02 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sep 22, 2005, at 11:53 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 23, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 23, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#5901] Re: RubyGems TODO — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...>
>> On 21-Sep-05, at 7:17 PM, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#5902] Vulnerability fixed in 1.8.3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
See below for a few grammar edits. As a separate issue, I would like
>>>>> "D" == Dominique Brezinski <dominique.brezinski@gmail.com> writes:
Yes, I can read it. You know, there are these things called
On 22 Sep 2005, at 09:36, Dominique Brezinski wrote:
On 9/22/05, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#5921] Mutually dependent libs double loading. — TRANS <transfire@...>
I'm on Ruby 1.8.2.
TRANS wrote:
On 9/22/05, Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm very suprised I have not gotten an official answer about this. Is
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, TRANS wrote:
[#5966] $SAFE=4 is still dangerous to use as a sandbox — URABE Shyouhei <s-urabe@...>
This issue has been discussed at security@ruby-lang.org, but matz told
[#5975] segmentation fault on require 'yaml' — Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@...>
Status: Open
[#5985] Finally an answer to my RubyGems question and some small suggestions — TRANS <transfire@...>
I appreciate those that attempted to offer me some info on this issue.
On 9/25/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#6001] Require Namepaces and RubyGems' effect on LoadPath problem — TRANS <transfire@...>
I've added namespaces to require. Works like this:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
TRANS wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I was working hard on an improved implementation.
On 9/29/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/29/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/29/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/29/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Quoting halostatue@gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:02:07AM +0900:
On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
Quoting halostatue@gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:29:17AM +0900:
On Sep 26, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
Quoting james@grayproductions.net, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:06:01AM +0900:
On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
Quoting halostatue@gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:49:14AM +0900:
On 9/27/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
> Right now, they're watching people who have pretty much sat on the side
On 9/27/05, Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> wrote:
I'll greatly weaken my post, and give everyone the opportunity to head me
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ralph Amissah wrote:
Hello,
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 07:35 pm, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:46:45AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:22:33AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:
Hi --
On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2005 22:41, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 08:54, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:
Ok, in an attempt to reduce clutter, I'm responding to several people in one
On Monday 26 September 2005 21:29, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 20:56 +0900, Sean E. Russell wrote:
Tom Copeland wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:02, James Britt wrote:
On 9/28/05, Sean E. Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:
On 9/28/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/28/05, Dominique Brezinski <dominique.brezinski@gmail.com> wrote:
For what it is worth, I live life behind an authenticated proxy, so I
I have got gems to work from behind an authenticated proxy.
On 9/28/05, Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> wrote:
Ah, yes, but many proxies require credentials for each new HTTP
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 08:43, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On 9/30/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#6004] Problem with 1.8.3, extensions — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#6009] Re: ruby 1.8.3 (2005-09-21) [i486-linux] sisu segfault — Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@...>
(i) correction, segfault is with official ruby 1.8.3 (2005-09-21), not
[sorry for duplicate post]
>>>>> "R" == Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/27/05, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
>>>>> "R" == Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
In article <200509291419.j8TEJYid015419@moulon.inra.fr>,
>>>>> "T" == Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:
ruby 1.8.3 (2005-09-29)
the segfault has returned with the latest ruby build
>>>>> "R" == Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> writes:
[#6038] make warning from 1.8.3 — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Solaris 10
[#6057] YAML loading of quoted Symbols broken in 1.8.3 — noreply@...
Bugs item #2535, was opened at 2005-09-28 11:50
At 01:58 +0900 29 Sep 2005, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#6076] Question about cgi.rb's read_multipart method and possible fix — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
Re: Mutually dependent libs double loading.
On 9/27/05, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote: > That is a circular dependency. Plain and simple. It doesn't matter if > you prefer to call it a "mutual" dependency because "they don't > actually depend on each other to do anything"... except that > "require" line of course. That require line is a "do" and "require" > === "depend". > > I think the key word in your paragraph above is "want" and reeks of > bad design smell. No it's not. What I "want" is prefectly legitimate. I have many small libs a user can call upon, some of those are closely related so they should "tag along". Call it what ever the heck you want, I used the term "mutual" simply to differentiate from "circular". Call it a "you're-my-friend" dependency, if it suits you better. I don't care. The point is if the end-user requires t1.rb then t2.rb should also be available. If they require t2.rb then so should t1.rb --without double-loading --no circular dependecy involved. Ironically enough, I have the same problem with Gems. Why? B/c I have two projects: Nano and Mega. Each depends on the other for certain resources --none of it circular. But alas I can't specify the mutual dependency b/c Gems chokes on it. Same basic misconception. Moreover if you consider your own reasoning more carefully, you'd see it actually supports my "want": the problem is a double-loading --which is a very real circle, and the one you are actually talking about. So as can be atested by the very real double-loading, Ruby is not presently doing dingy about circular dependencies. I'm actaully discouraging them! All I'm asking is that, if possible, Ruby not require a file it's is currently in the middle loading. Maybe ther are very ral reasons it cannot do this. If so I would like to hear them. But don't tell me my program smells --that completely forgoes the issue. T.