[#5711] Lexic confusion: method/local variable distinction works strange — noreply@...
Bugs item #2371, was opened at 2005-09-04 00:40
Hi,
Mine is 1.8.2 and it does raise syntax error.
[#5732] Re: Ruby development issue tracking will go to basecamp — ville.mattila@...
[#5737] returning strings from methods/instance_methods — TRANS <transfire@...>
I was just wondering why with #methods and #instance_methods, it was
Hi,
On 9/8/05, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#5750] File.split edge cases — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
nobuyoshi nakada wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5781] array sharing — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
This is my first time poking around in the ruby source code, so
[#5786] Difference between class declarations — Peter Vanbroekhoven <calamitas@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 9/15/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
[#5796] proposed attr writer patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
Daniel Berger wrote:
James Britt <ruby@jamesbritt.com> writes:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#5798] Makefile error in OpenSLL extension (on Windows) — noreply@...
Bugs item #2472, was opened at 2005-09-16 18:56
Hi,
This is the just released 1.8.3 preview2.
Hi,
No, win32/Makefile.sub doe not contain those two lines.
Hi,
On 9/18/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
Hi,
On 9/18/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
[#5844] Ruby 1.8.3 released — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hello Rubyists,
[#5848] Re: RubyGems in Ruby HEAD — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Chad Fowler wrote:
[#5851] Re: RubyGems in Ruby HEAD — Paul van Tilburg <paul@...>
Hi all,
I don't know if I can post to all those lists, but I'll leave them
Paul van Tilburg wrote:
Marc Dequ竪nes (Duck) wrote:
On 9/22/05, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
On 9/23/05, Pascal Terjan <pterjan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/23/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#5882] Re: RubyGems TODO — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Okay. I said in the main thread on ruby-core that I'm putting together a
On 9/22/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#5888] Re: RubyGems TODO — Mauricio Fern疣dez <mfp@...>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:46:18AM +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
[#5898] Delegate and Forwardable Documentation — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
I've tried to send these files through a couple of times now with
On Sep 22, 2005, at 9:02 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Sep 22, 2005, at 11:53 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 23, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Sep 23, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#5901] Re: RubyGems TODO — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...>
>> On 21-Sep-05, at 7:17 PM, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#5902] Vulnerability fixed in 1.8.3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
See below for a few grammar edits. As a separate issue, I would like
>>>>> "D" == Dominique Brezinski <dominique.brezinski@gmail.com> writes:
Yes, I can read it. You know, there are these things called
On 22 Sep 2005, at 09:36, Dominique Brezinski wrote:
On 9/22/05, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#5921] Mutually dependent libs double loading. — TRANS <transfire@...>
I'm on Ruby 1.8.2.
TRANS wrote:
On 9/22/05, Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm very suprised I have not gotten an official answer about this. Is
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, TRANS wrote:
[#5966] $SAFE=4 is still dangerous to use as a sandbox — URABE Shyouhei <s-urabe@...>
This issue has been discussed at security@ruby-lang.org, but matz told
[#5975] segmentation fault on require 'yaml' — Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@...>
Status: Open
[#5985] Finally an answer to my RubyGems question and some small suggestions — TRANS <transfire@...>
I appreciate those that attempted to offer me some info on this issue.
On 9/25/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#6001] Require Namepaces and RubyGems' effect on LoadPath problem — TRANS <transfire@...>
I've added namespaces to require. Works like this:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/26/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
TRANS wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I was working hard on an improved implementation.
On 9/29/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/29/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/29/05, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/29/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Quoting halostatue@gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:02:07AM +0900:
On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
Quoting halostatue@gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:29:17AM +0900:
On Sep 26, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
Quoting james@grayproductions.net, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:06:01AM +0900:
On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
Quoting halostatue@gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:49:14AM +0900:
On 9/27/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
> Right now, they're watching people who have pretty much sat on the side
On 9/27/05, Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> wrote:
I'll greatly weaken my post, and give everyone the opportunity to head me
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ralph Amissah wrote:
Hello,
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 07:35 pm, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:46:45AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:22:33AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:
Hi --
On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2005 22:41, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 08:54, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:
Ok, in an attempt to reduce clutter, I'm responding to several people in one
On Monday 26 September 2005 21:29, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 20:56 +0900, Sean E. Russell wrote:
Tom Copeland wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:02, James Britt wrote:
On 9/28/05, Sean E. Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:
On 9/28/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/28/05, Dominique Brezinski <dominique.brezinski@gmail.com> wrote:
For what it is worth, I live life behind an authenticated proxy, so I
I have got gems to work from behind an authenticated proxy.
On 9/28/05, Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> wrote:
Ah, yes, but many proxies require credentials for each new HTTP
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 08:43, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On 9/30/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#6004] Problem with 1.8.3, extensions — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#6009] Re: ruby 1.8.3 (2005-09-21) [i486-linux] sisu segfault — Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@...>
(i) correction, segfault is with official ruby 1.8.3 (2005-09-21), not
[sorry for duplicate post]
>>>>> "R" == Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/27/05, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
>>>>> "R" == Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
In article <200509291419.j8TEJYid015419@moulon.inra.fr>,
>>>>> "T" == Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:
ruby 1.8.3 (2005-09-29)
the segfault has returned with the latest ruby build
>>>>> "R" == Ralph Amissah <ralph.amissah@gmail.com> writes:
[#6038] make warning from 1.8.3 — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Solaris 10
[#6057] YAML loading of quoted Symbols broken in 1.8.3 — noreply@...
Bugs item #2535, was opened at 2005-09-28 11:50
At 01:58 +0900 29 Sep 2005, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#6076] Question about cgi.rb's read_multipart method and possible fix — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
Re: gems is a language change, not a pkging system
Quoting halostatue@gmail.com, on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:29:17AM +0900: > On 9/26/05, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote: > > Its not a packaging system, its not an addition to the standard library, > > it is a change in the behaviour of one of the most fundamental of Kernel > > methods. > > It is a packaging system, it is an addition to the standard library. > It *is also* a change in behaviour, but it is one that will behave > *very preditably* and without harm to those who choose -- through one > means or another -- to not use RubyGems. No harm? You, user of rubygems, state this as supposed fact. Others, not users of rubygems, do not have this experience of "no harm". Dismissing all code that is harmed as unncessary is missing the point. Depending on the language require mechanism to work as they always have is not wrong, changing it mid-stream is. > > I fail to see the need for language support for a particular packaging > > system. I don't see why the need for versioned lib dependencies for > > rails requires a language change, I don't see why packaging requires a > > language change, and I don't see why versioned dependencies and > > packaging are so strongly coupled that you are forced to eat the > > language change in order to install a library. > > Then you fail to see the point in general. Ruby needs something that > works similar to -- but better than -- CPAN. This means a packaging > system. You may not see it, but those of us who have to deal with > other platforms see it. Nowhere do I imply that ruby doesn't need a packaging system. I said the opposite. In particular, it needs a packaging system that is not tied to versioning. > > They should be decoupled, require does NOT have to be changed in order > > to support package distribution. Split versioning into an optional > > facility for those who need it. > > This is also a fundamental misunderstanding of what has to be changed. The require change is for versioning, not packaging. If you believe that the language change is fundamental to get packaging "similar to -- but better than -- CPAN", feel free to point out why, and why such a language change wasn't required for Perl (or C, or ...). Sam