From: TRANS <transfire@...>
Date: 2005-09-24T15:14:15+09:00
Subject: Re: Mutually dependent libs double loading.

On 9/24/05, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, TRANS wrote:
>
> > Okay, that's my rant. Yes, it's a combination of unspokens building up.
> > I think the camel straw was not being able to get a list of Kernel
> > module_functions, and that upon discovering, after years of thinking
> > otherwise, Object doesn't really have any methods.
>
> Well, why do you think Kernel exists at all?... to me it's just
> there to add confusion, because all classes that inherit from
> Kernel also inherit from Object, because *all* classes inherit from
> Object.

Indeed! I had mistakenly thought that Object's methods were tied to
"self", while Kernel methods were independent and thus could be/were
module_function. Obviously I was wrong, so now I must agree with your
analysis.

T.