From: TRANS Date: 2005-09-24T13:33:26+09:00 Subject: Re: Mutually dependent libs double loading. I'm very suprised I have not gotten an official answer about this. Is this really an ignorable issue? Apparently most of what I have to say is ignorable. Well, at least Florian is generally kind enough to comment. Thanks Florian. I realize people are busy --we're all busy. Is the problem that only Matz and Nabu have any authority? (or know enough english to respond?) Do I not follow proper protocols? Is that it? If so I wish some one would direct me to them. Or is it just something one's supposed to "know" being with the "in" group. Well, I don't do the "network" thing, so I guess I'm out of luck. or is it that it's just a dumb question --and most of my thought equaly as stupid. Maybe that are. If so I wish someone would just tell me so instead of letting rattle on like I'm actually doding something. Okay, that's my rant. Yes, it's a combination of unspokens building up. I think the camel straw was not being able to get a list of Kernel module_functions, and that upon discovering, after years of thinking otherwise, Object doesn't really have any methods. T.