From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2005-09-19T20:26:51+09:00
Subject: Re: proposed attr writer patch

Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> writes:

> On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>> James Britt <ruby@jamesbritt.com> writes:
>> > Daniel Berger wrote:
>> 
>> IMHO, `foo?' makes sense (if @foo is meant to be boolean),
>
> IMHO, FOO$ also makes sense, if it is meant to be a string.

Nice troll. :P

Furthermore, I propose an extension---"RORTRAN"---that will allow old
time number-crunchers to make an easier transition to Ruby.

Variable name starting with "IN" are automatically forced to Integers,
the ones with "Z" get complex numbers.  All other variables are
handled as Floats.  Strings are of no use to RORTRAN.

> Mathieu Bouchard
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org