From: Jacob Quinn Shenker Date: 2005-09-08T13:57:58+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby development issue tracking will go to basecamp Could there be an unprivileged "guest" account for people like me wholike to watch but don't actually develop? Jacob On 9/7/05, ville.mattila@stonesoft.com wrote:> > Hello Matz,> > I'm not committer, but active watcher. Could I have account to basecamp. I> preffer "mulperi" as my login name.> > thanks,> > Ville> > > > |---------+--------------------------->> | | Yukihiro |> | | Matsumoto |> | | | | org> |> | | |> | | 09/08/2005 07:04|> | | Please respond |> | | to ruby-core |> | | |> |---------+--------------------------->> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|> | |> | To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org |> | cc: |> | Subject: Ruby development issue tracking will go to basecamp |> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|> > > > > Dear Ruby CVS Committers, and watchers,> > Since I have been sick of poorly managed issue tracking in Ruby> development (my bad), finally I decided to move on to basecamp.> Anyone with committing permission will be granted an account on the> Ruby development project on > > I have already created accounts for Shugo, and Nobu. Others should> contact me for his account with his preferred account name.> > Frequently Unasked (yet) Question:> > * Why basecamp? Why not trac?> > I know even 37signals use trac to manage their software. The biggest> reason is that I want to try something new. We have CVS repository> working almost fine, and other tools set up. I don't want to pay huge> price for transition. I also checked cvstrac but it doesn't appear as> usable as I expected.> > If it would be found out that basecamp is not suitable for the> purpose, we will try something else.> > > matz.> > > > > > > >